Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pollock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$960k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.7MArts & Culture$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.2MReligion$915kEnvironment$560kEducation$455kCivil Rights$250kEmployment$200kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $863k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$150,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$125,000
TEMPLE EMANU-EL$100,000
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS$100,000
PARKLAND HEALTH FOUNDATION$75,000
DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$62,500
FOREST FORWARD$50,000
DALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
KERA$50,000
DALLAS ARBORETUM$50,000
UNITED TO LEARN$25,000
VOGEL ALCOVE$25,000
FRIENDS OF KATY TRAIL$25,000
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $15k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $5k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $25k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $25k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $25k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $25k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $15k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $15k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 32 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -72% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
3

Total granted

$7.8M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-72%

Still filing today

59%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +105%
  • PF
    PARKLAND FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $570k · revenue +7%
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $560k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SM
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • GW
    GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • DE
    DME Exchange of Dallas Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

2
Dallas Childrens Theater Inc

The mission of dallas children's theater is to inspire young people to creative and productive lives through the art of theater.to give rise to inspiring theater, dallas children's theater:- creates and produces innovative professional…

Arts & Culture
3
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

4
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
5
Dallas Innovation Alliance

The Dallas Innovation Alliance (DIA) is a 501(c)(3) public-private consortium of public, private, civic and academia to support smart city initiatives in Dallas. Our definition of a Smart City is one at the intersection of community, data…

Community Improvement
6
Dallas Services

The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.

7
Dallas Contemporary

Dallas contemporary presents art in a forum that cultivates artists, ignites learning and inspires the community. dallas contemporary is a non-collecting art museum presenting new and challenging ideas from regional, national and…

Arts & Culture
8
COMMIT2DALLAS

Our mission is that by 2040, at least half of all 25 to 34 year old residents of Dallas County, irrespective of race, will earn a living wage. Together, we cultivate a collaborative educational ecosystem with school systems, higher…

Education
9
Dallas Theater Center

Dtc will engage, entertain, and inspire our diverse community by creating experiences that stimulate new ways of thinking and living and by producing plays, educational programs, and other initiatives that are of the highest quality and…

Arts & Culture
10
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

11
Broadway Dallas Inc

To educate the public in music appreciation and fine arts, including the presentation of musical theater and other shows with educational value.

Arts & Culture
12
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Museum of Art and the most unlike its peers is Dme Exchange of Dallas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $1,170,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKTEMPLE EMANU-EL — $900,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-ELTHE LEGACY — $500,000 · OtherTHE LEGACYSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER — $400,000 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FND — $300,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FNDDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $287,500 · OtherDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAIndividual grant recipient — $250,000 · OtherDALLAS HOLOCAUST AND HUMAN RIGHTS — $250,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $200,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KATY TRAIL — $174,999 · Other+9 more — $393,500 · Other+9 moreDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $400,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHON…Dallas Museum of Art — $225,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum …NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXAS PU…BIG THOUGHT — $140,000 · Arts & CultureBIG THOUGHTDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $100,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Holocau…PARKLAND FOUNDATION — $570,000 · HealthPARKLAND FOU…CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS — $300,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S H…DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $560,000 · EnvironmentVOGEL ALCOVE — $155,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place — $115,000 · Human ServicesGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT — $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesLUMIN EDUCATION — $120,000 · EducationUNITED TO LEARN — $75,000 · EducationOUT TEACH — $70,000 · EducationFOREST FORWARD — $100,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,825,999Arts & Culture$1,015,000Health$870,000Environment$560,000Human Services$315,000Education$265,000Community Improvement$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $1,170,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $570,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $560,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $400,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $225,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $200,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $155,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG THOUGHT — $140,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLUMIN EDUCATION — $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Family Place — $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFOREST FORWARD — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN — $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOUT TEACH — $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas — $53,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TEACHING TRUST — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDME Exchange of Dallas Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
  • Who funds BIG THOUGHT
  • Who funds LUMIN EDUCATION
  • Who funds The Family Place
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum
  • Who funds FOREST FORWARD
  • Who funds UNITED TO LEARN
  • Who funds OUT TEACH
  • Who funds The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas
  • Who funds THE TEACHING TRUST
  • Who funds GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC
  • Who funds DME Exchange of Dallas Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · Hirsch Family Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · George & Fay Young Foundation Inc · The Hoglund Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Byrne Family Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pollock Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pollock Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pollock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph