· Private foundation
Polk Family Charitable Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k66 grants · $137k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRADLES TO CRAYONS | $50,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $20,000 |
| WELLESLEY COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $14,000 |
| COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION | $14,000 |
| ORT AMERICA | $9,000 |
| SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION | $7,500 |
| SCHOOL ALTERNATIVES | $7,000 |
| LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $6,700 |
| BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS | $6,650 |
| CHURCH OF CHRIST CO LANDON WEEKS | $6,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOC FOR SURGERY OF TRAUMA | $5,000 |
| THE MANNY&PAT SANCHEZ FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
107 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWellesley College7× · 2018–2025 · $125k · revenue +81%
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION8× · 2018–2025 · $110k · revenue +51%- OAORT AMERICA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $69k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- NLNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -43%
- YMYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGOone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -4%
- RWREVOLUTION WORKSHOPgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Lauri S Bauer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Council on Urban Affairs ↗
- Who funds SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds REVOLUTION WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds The Wounded Blue ↗
- Who funds TIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BOULDER COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Emsa Fund Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Dr Scholl Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Healthcare Foundation of Highland Park · AbbVie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Polk Family Charitable Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Performance Works Northwest Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Suffolk University — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Polk Family Charitable Fund?
Find your warmest path to Polk Family Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.