· Private foundation
Point of View Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POINT OF VIEW FUND CO MS GIFT | $29,000 |
| CHARITY NAVIGATOR | $25,000 |
| ROW NEW YORK | $25,000 |
| BIGLERVILLE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC | $20,000 |
| PAN MASSACHUSETTES CHALLENGE | $10,000 |
| GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| PENNON ORGANIZATION DBA WITF | $10,000 |
| CAMP SUNSHINE | $10,000 |
| BENDERSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE COMPANY | $5,000 |
| ST LUKE NEW LIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| BELL SOCIALIZATION SERVICES | $5,000 |
| GLORIA COLES FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY | $5,000 |
| WEECONNECT EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $5,000 |
| ADAMS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNCharity Navigator8× · 2018–2025 · $225k · revenue +95%
- ACADAMS COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM INC3× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +62%
- TATHE ADAMS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- POPOINT OF VIEW FUND CO AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FUNDone grant, 2023 · $113k
- HAHARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -64%
- SJST JOHN VIANNEYone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…
The arc of rensselaer county is committed to advocating for the rights and safety of individuals of all ages who primarily have intellectual disabilities and, in some instances, have other developmental disabilities or delays. the arc is a…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Community Action Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Biglerville Hist & Preserv Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADAMS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds NORWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC ↗
- Who funds YORK DAY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE ↗
- Who funds ROOTS FOR BOOTS ↗
- Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds BIGLERVILLE HIST & PRESERV SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WEE CONNECT EARLY LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds FOR THE LOVE OF A VETERAN INC ↗
- Who funds St Luke N E W Life Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Adams County Community Foundation Inc · York County Community Foundation · Rice Family Foundation · Kinsley Foundation · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Wellspan Health · Powder Mill Foundation · Partnership for Better Health · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · Community Aid Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Point of View Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mental Health Connecticut Inc — 82% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Point of View Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Point of View Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.