Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pohly-Turaj Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$3.6MArts & Culture$2.6MEducation$1.6MRecreation & Sports$363kFood & Nutrition$210kYouth Development$195kHealth$122kInternational$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $560k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$35,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATER INC$300,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$230,000
TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC$130,000
NY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$100,000
HELLO FUTURE INC$50,000
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$50,000
USTA FOUNDATION$35,955
NEW YORK POPS INC$35,000
SERVE AND RETURN INC$16,100
ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC$15,000
INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
BOYS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC$10,000
HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$1,800
JAMESTOWN FUND$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $20k → 17%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CO
KY
VA
TN
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.2M · 22 repeat orgs$755k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
24

Total granted

$8.2M
$728k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

73%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +59%
  • TT
    TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $778k · revenue +6%
  • NY
    NEW YORK POPS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE POHLY TURAJ FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $478k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • SS
    SHOOTING STARS
    one grant, 2023 · $33k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
New York Junior Tennis League Inc

To develop the character of young people through tennis and education, emphasizing the ideals and life of arthur ashe. see part iii, line 1 for more detail.

5
The Brooklyn Nets & New York Liberty Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Manhattan Theatre Club Inc

Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…

Arts & Culture
7
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
The Dance Ring Inc

New york theatre ballet's (nytb) mission is to inspire a love of dance for audiences of all ages by offering affordable prices for a range of performances and public activities throughout the year.

10
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
11
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
12
Usta National Tennis Center Incorporated

To promote and develop the game of tennis as a means to healthful recreation and physical fitness and to operate a year-round public recreational facility.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Morgan Hoffmann Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsJewish Community FederationsYouth Development CentersVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Classical Music EnsemblesIndependent K-8 SchoolsFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr19%21%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%12%20–35yr13%73%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,727

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE - POHLY TURAJ CHARITABLE FUND — $2,611,540 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE - POHLY TURAJ CHARITABLE FUNDYALE UNIVERSITY — $853,184 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYTHE POHLY TURAJ FAMILY FOUNDATION — $477,730 · OtherTHE POHLY TURAJ FAMILY FOUNDATIONYALE UNIVERSITY — $301,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY+26 more — $633,631 · Other+26 moreTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER — $1,206,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC …TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC — $777,609 · Arts & CultureTADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE…NEW YORK POPS INC — $300,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK POPS INCNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $200,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL+1 more — $1,800 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CARES INC — $460,000 · PhilanthropyHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC — $251,800 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $165,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $171,955 · Recreation & SportsSERVE AND RETURN INC — $86,350 · Recreation & SportsINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED — $80,000 · Recreation & SportsCITY HARVEST INC — $210,000 · Food & NutritionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $50,000 · HealthMORGAN HOFFMANN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthR BABY FOUNDATION INC — $16,600 · HealthCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · Health
Other$4,877,085Arts & Culture$2,485,409Philanthropy$460,000Education$432,800Recreation & Sports$338,305Food & Nutrition$210,000Health$101,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER — $1,206,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC — $777,609 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC — $460,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNEW YORK POPS INC — $300,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC — $251,800 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $171,955 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $165,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHELLO FUTURE INC — $154,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetSERVE AND RETURN INC — $86,350 over 7y, 38% of budgetINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED — $80,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC — $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEW HYTES INC — $26,060 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetPRENTICE CUP FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetMORGAN HOFFMANN FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetR BABY FOUNDATION INC — $16,600 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMORY'S PRESERVATION INC — $1,800 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNCOMMONORG INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WESTHAMPTON AMBULANCE INC — $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER
  • Who funds TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK POPS INC
  • Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL
  • Who funds USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds HELLO FUTURE INC
  • Who funds SERVE AND RETURN INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC
  • Who funds NEW HYTES INC
  • Who funds PRENTICE CUP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MORGAN HOFFMANN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds R BABY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds THE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds ANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pohly-Turaj Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pohly-Turaj Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pohly-Turaj Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph