Skip to content

· Private foundation

PM2 Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$64kReligion$25kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$6kEducation$3kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Centerpoint Church$22,001
Luke Strong & Son Mortuary$8,240
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,115
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WAMY Community Action$5,000
13 Various Small Grants$4,356
Rockbridge County High School$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Mercy Ships$2,575
A Door of Hope$2,575
TOE River Valley Soup Ministry$2,500
Preston Taylor Ministries$2,052
Individual grant recipient$1,495
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Parc Inc: $507 → 12%Metropolitan Ministries: $1k → 13%Cornerstone Fanily Ministries: $1k → 13%Cornerstone Family Ministries: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$138k · 11 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
29

Total granted

$138k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    ICDM
    4× · 2017–2024 · $54k
  • 1V
    13 Various Small Grants
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k
  • CC
    CENTERPOINT CHURCH INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
  • 2V
    25 Various Small Grants
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MF
    Meds for Angie Alfano
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
2
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
3
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
4
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
5
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
6
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
7
Phoenix Gospel Mission

Provide christ-centered, life-transforming solutions to persons facing hunger, homelessness, addiction, and trauma. the phoenix rescue mission is a place of hope, healing, and new beginnings for men, women, and children in our community.

Religion
8
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
9
New Life Family Services

New life family services is a minnesota faith-based non-profit aaahc-accredited medical clinic and social service agency primarily focused on providing life-affirming pregnancy, parenting, and adoption support.

—
10
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
11
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

—
12
Mission Clinical Services

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Solutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Restored to Dream Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICDM: $53,628 · OtherICDMIndividual grant recipient: $48,220 · OtherIndividual grant recipient13 Various Small Grants: $30,271 · Other13 Various Small GrantsCENTERPOINT CHURCH: $22,001 · OtherCENTERPOINT CHURCH25 Various Small Grants: $19,770 · Other25 Various Small GrantsCENTERPOINT CHURCH INC: $18,453 · OtherCENTERPOINT CHURCH INC+35 more: $84,710 · Other+35 morePRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES: $7,916 · EducationA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $5,265 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $5,150 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · HealthNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $150 · HealthCORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC: $1,569 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,049 · Human ServicesPARC INC: $507 · Human ServicesFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $2,510 · Food & Nutrition
Other$277,053Education$7,916Religion$5,265International$5,150Health$4,650Human Services$3,125Food & Nutrition$2,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES: $7,916 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $5,265 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORED TO DREAM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $2,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMFORTCARE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC: $1,569 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARC INC: $507 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreath of Life Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds A DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds RESTORED TO DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMFORTCARE WOMEN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PM2 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PM2 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Parc Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on PM2’s filings →

More from the funding graph