Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

PM2 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$64kReligion$25kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$6kEducation$3kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,343
Median grant
5
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
13 Various Small Grants$13,550
Mercy Ships$2,575
Comfort Care Womans Health$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Rockbridge County High School$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ICDM$1,343
Cornerstone Fanily Ministries$1,069
WAMY Community Action$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Friends of Ted Rhodes$900
Preston Taylor Ministries$872
Family Minsitries$500
St Jude Childrens$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Parc Inc: $507 → 12%Metropolitan Ministries: $1k → 13%Cornerstone Fanily Ministries: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$109k · 6 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$109k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    ICDM
    4× · 2017–2024 · $54k
  • 1V
    13 Various Small Grants
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k
  • CC
    CENTERPOINT CHURCH INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $48k
  • 2V
    25 Various Small Grants
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MF
    Meds for Angie Alfano
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
2
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
3
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
4
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
5
Phoenix Gospel Mission

Provide christ-centered, life-transforming solutions to persons facing hunger, homelessness, addiction, and trauma. the phoenix rescue mission is a place of hope, healing, and new beginnings for men, women, and children in our community.

Religion
6
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
7
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

9
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
10
Mission Clinical Services

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
11
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

12
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Restored to Dream Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ICDM — $53,628 · OtherICDMIndividual grant recipient — $48,220 · OtherIndividual grant recipient13 Various Small Grants — $25,915 · Other13 Various Small Grants25 Various Small Grants — $19,770 · Other25 Various Small GrantsCENTERPOINT CHURCH INC — $18,453 · OtherCENTERPOINT CHURCH INC+25 more — $36,630 · Other+25 morePRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES — $5,864 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · HealthNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $1,500 · Health+1 more — $150 · HealthA DOOR OF HOPE INC — $2,690 · ReligionCORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $1,069 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $1,049 · Human ServicesPARC INC — $507 · Human ServicesMercy Ships International — $2,575 · InternationalFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $2,510 · Food & Nutrition
Other$202,616Education$5,864Health$4,650Religion$2,690Human Services$2,625International$2,575Food & Nutrition$2,510

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES — $5,864 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRESTORED TO DREAM INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC — $2,690 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $2,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMFORTCARE WOMEN'S HEALTH — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $1,069 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARC INC — $507 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreath of Life Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESTON TAYLOR MINISTRIES
  • Who funds RESTORED TO DREAM INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds A DOOR OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
  • Who funds COMFORTCARE WOMEN'S HEALTH
  • Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds PARC INC
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Breath of Life Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization PM2 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc2% of income from government
  • Parc Inc2% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph