Skip to content
Plumeria Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Plumeria Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$260kInternational$66kYouth Development$26kFood & Nutrition$25kCivil Rights$18kHuman Services$16kEducation$14kCrime & Legal$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $750
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$774k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATHFINDERS$90,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND INC$250
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED$250
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONESIGHT: $500 → 6%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2k → 14%ONESIGHT: $500 → 6%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2k → 14%ONESIGHT: $500 → 6%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%ONESIGHT: $500 → 6%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5k → 14%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
WY
OH
CT
CA
CO
AZ
DC
HI
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$440k · 24 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$440k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-55%

Still filing today

92%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalCivil RightsEnvironmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    Pathfinders
    6× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +141%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +12%
  • INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $28k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WR
    Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -55%
  • AU
    ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +174%
  • MS
    MEN STOPPING VIOLENCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
7
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
8
Aclu Foundation of Arizona

The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.

Civil Rights
9
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
10
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
11
Water Protector Legal Collective

The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.

Crime & Legal
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Asian University for Women (Auw) Support Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pathfinders: $156,000 · HealthPathfindersPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $65,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $25,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERSWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $1,750 · HealthSave The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 · InternationalSave The Childre…INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $27,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PL…MERCY AND SHARING: $3,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $6,500 · Human ServicesOneSight: $2,000 · Human ServicesMA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM: $25,500 · Youth DevelopmentHealthy All Together: $12,000 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyASPEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EmploymentG Baines: $7,500 · OtherG BainesEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 · OtherEQUAL JUSTI…KE AO HALII: $5,500 · OtherKE AO HALIIASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3,350 · OtherASPEN VALLE…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,500 · OtherSOUTHERN PO…KIND INC: $2,000 · OtherPAULINE S SCHNEEGAS WILDLIFE FOUNDA: $3,700 · OtherPAULINE S S…+12 more: $9,450 · Other+12 more
Health$257,750International$65,500Human Services$33,500Youth Development$25,500Philanthropy$17,000Employment$13,000Other$46,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPathfinders: $156,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM: $25,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHealthy All Together: $12,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKE AO HALII: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAULINE S SCHNEEGAS WILDLIFE FOUNDA: $3,700 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $3,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY AND SHARING: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOneSight: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOak Park River Forest Infant Welfare S: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROARING FORK PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC RADIO: $1,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEN STOPPING VIOLENCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE D T FLEMING ARBORETUM AT PU'U MAHOE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Colorado Gives Founda…Brady FoundationNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Aspen Community FoundationCO21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Brady Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Plumeria Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Plumeria Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Plumeria Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Plumeria Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Plumeria Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home