Skip to content
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest

To ensure broad public access to sexual and reproductive health care through direct service, education and advocacy.

$833k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$665k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$121kCommunity Improvement$118kCivil Rights$92kFood & Nutrition$58kPhilanthropy$58kCrime & Legal$45kPublic Benefit$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $707,869, the rows itemized in this filing. The $832,869 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $125,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $250k+1 grant · $665k
$32,869
Median grant
1
States reached
$158M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST$665,000
PROTECT OUR HEALTHCARE$32,869
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ISSUES PAC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK: $20k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $13k → 13%FAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK: $10k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $10k → 13%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $9k → 11%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $20k → 11%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $10k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $15k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $125k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$125k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 20 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+32%

Still filing today

85%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +11% · 75% of their budget
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +70%
  • IV
    Imperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $33k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SB
    SIGMA BETA XI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • BO
    BROTHERS OF THE DESERT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

PP Advocates is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Our mission is to preserve and broaden access to reproductive health care through legislation, public education, and electoral activity.

—
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
4
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
5
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
6
Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc. ("PPPSGV") are essential health care providers and trusted educators who center our work on sexual and reproductive care and advocate for all people to live authentic and healthy…

Health
7
Access Reproductive Justice

The purpose of ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE is to remove barriers to sexual and reproductive health care and build the power of Californians to demand health, justice, and dignity.

—
8
California Black Womens Health Project

Educate and advocate to improve the health of Calfornia's black women and girls

Health
9
Forward Together Action

FORWARD TOGETHER ACTION (FTA) is an national reproductive justice organization that ORGANIZES COMMUNITIES who experience reproductive oppression TO BUILD POWER. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of colorAnd…

Human Services
10
Los Angeles Guild for Reproductive Health

Reproductive healthcare services.

Health
11
California Black Power Network Action Fund

Promote social welfare thru political policy

Civil Rights
12
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Black Pride; the most unlike its peers is Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $3,056,529 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST+12 more: $245,000 · Other+12 moreFOR THE VILLAGE INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesTodec Legal Center Perris: $30,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $30,000 · Human ServicesWOMANHAVEN A CENTER FOR FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $8,500 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $39,500 · HealthCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER: $22,500 · HealthTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $20,000 · HealthABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL INC: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA: $10,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $10,000 · HealthImperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc: $32,500 · Civil RightsTHE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D: $30,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE: $32,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyBROWN BAG COALITION: $32,500 · Food & NutritionPROJECT NEW VILLAGE: $25,000 · Food & NutritionProtect Our Healthcare: $32,869 · Public BenefitSIGMA BETA XI INC: $15,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,301,529Human Services$151,000Health$112,000Civil Rights$62,500Philanthropy$57,500Food & Nutrition$57,500Public Benefit$47,869

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $3,056,529 over 8y, 75% of budgetALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY: $42,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $39,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetProtect Our Healthcare: $32,869 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetImperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc: $32,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE: $32,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetFOR THE VILLAGE INC: $32,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetSTARTING OVER INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBROWN BAG COALITION: $32,500 over 4y, 22% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $30,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPEACE RESOURCE CENTER OF SAN DIEGO: $30,000 over 2y, 72% of budgetPROJECT NEW VILLAGE: $25,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER: $22,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWOMANHAVEN A CENTER FOR FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIGMA BETA XI INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBROTHERS OF THE DESERT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEquality California Issues PAC: $10,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY FOSTER KIDS: $5,000 over 2y, 32% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The California Wellne…Inland Empire Communi…Catalyst of San Diego…Women's Foundation of…Weingart FoundationTides FoundationAlliance Healthcare F…Sierra Health Foundat…The San Diego Foundat…Liberty Hill Foundati…Regional Access Proje…
The California EndowmentCA26.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · Women's Foundation of California · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The San Diego Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home