Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest

To ensure broad public access to sexual and reproductive health care through direct service, education and advocacy.

$833k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$665k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $707,869 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $832,869 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $125,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $250k+1 grant · $665k
$32,869
Median grant
1
States reached
$158M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST$665,000
PROTECT OUR HEALTHCARE$32,869
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA ISSUES PAC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK: $20k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $13k → 13%FAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK: $10k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $10k → 13%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $9k → 11%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $20k → 11%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%FOR THE VILLAGE INC: $10k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $15k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $125k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$125k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 20 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+7%

Still filing today

85%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +11% · 75% of their budget
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +70%
  • SO
    STARTING OVER INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $33k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SB
    SIGMA BETA XI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • BO
    BROTHERS OF THE DESERT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

PP Advocates is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Our mission is to preserve and broaden access to reproductive health care through legislation, public education, and electoral activity.

—
2
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
3
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
4
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
5
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
6
Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc. ("PPPSGV") are essential health care providers and trusted educators who center our work on sexual and reproductive care and advocate for all people to live authentic and healthy…

Health
7
Access Reproductive Justice

The purpose of ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE is to remove barriers to sexual and reproductive health care and build the power of Californians to demand health, justice, and dignity.

—
8
Forward Together Action

FORWARD TOGETHER ACTION (FTA) is an national reproductive justice organization that ORGANIZES COMMUNITIES who experience reproductive oppression TO BUILD POWER. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of colorAnd…

Human Services
9
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
10
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
11
California Black Womens Health Project

Educate and advocate to improve the health of Calfornia's black women and girls

Health
12
Center for Immigrant Protection

The LGBTAP is the only San Francisco nonprofit organization exclusively dedicated to providing accessible legal representation for LGBT asylum seekers who are fleeing persecution due to their sexual orientation, gener identity and/or HIV…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Black Pride and the most unlike its peers is Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%9%<5yr16%31%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr10%6%35–55yr12%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%3%20–35yr10%85%35–55yr12%0%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
2/45
the rest of the field
16%
11,486/73,016

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
23/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $3,056,529 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST+12 more — $245,000 · Other+12 moreFOR THE VILLAGE INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY — $30,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTodec Legal Center Perris — $30,000 · Human ServicesWOMANHAVEN A CENTER FOR FAMILY SOLUTIONS — $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES — $8,500 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $39,500 · HealthCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER — $22,500 · HealthTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER — $20,000 · HealthABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL INC — $10,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA — $10,000 · HealthImperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc — $32,500 · Civil RightsTHE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D — $30,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE — $32,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyBROWN BAG COALITION — $32,500 · Food & NutritionPROJECT NEW VILLAGE — $25,000 · Food & NutritionProtect Our Healthcare — $32,869 · Public BenefitSIGMA BETA XI INC — $15,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,301,529Human Services$151,000Health$112,000Civil Rights$62,500Philanthropy$57,500Food & Nutrition$57,500Public Benefit$47,869

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $3,056,529 over 8y, 75% of budgetALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY — $42,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE — $39,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSTARTING OVER INC — $32,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFOR THE VILLAGE INC — $32,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE — $32,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBROWN BAG COALITION — $32,500 over 4y, 22% of budgetImperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc — $32,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY — $30,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPEACE RESOURCE CENTER OF SAN DIEGO — $30,000 over 2y, 72% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NETWORK INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT NEW VILLAGE — $25,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER — $22,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetWOMANHAVEN A CENTER FOR FAMILY SOLUTIONS — $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIGMA BETA XI INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBROTHERS OF THE DESERT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetEquality California Issues PAC — $10,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE ADVOCATES SERVING AK HI ID IN KY AND WA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES — $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY FOSTER KIDS — $5,000 over 2y, 32% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The California Wellne…Inland Empire Communi…Catalyst of San Diego…Women's Foundation of…Weingart FoundationTides FoundationAlliance Healthcare F…Sierra Health Foundat…The San Diego Foundat…Liberty Hill Foundati…Regional Access Proje…
The California EndowmentCA26.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · Women's Foundation of California · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The San Diego Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines