Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pk Seidman Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$566kHuman Services$165kYouth Development$147kArts & Culture$117kInternational$78kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$49kRecreation & Sports$39kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$20,000
SHEPHERD'S HAVEN$10,000
APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT$10,000
BARTLETT HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS$10,000
WOODLAND PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL$10,000
MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$10,000
ORPHEUM THEATRE$10,000
BARTLETT PERFORMING ARTS & CONFERENCE CENTER$9,000
MEMPHIS BOTANIC GARDEN$7,200
MEMPHIS ZOO$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS$5,000
MEMPHIS UNION MISSION$5,000
ROOM IN THE INN$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%FAYETTE CARES: $10k → 10%FAYETTE CARES: $5k → 10%FAYETTE CARES: $5k → 10%FAYETTE CARES: $3k → 10%FAYETTE CARES: $3k → 10%FAYETTE CARES: $2k → 10%MERITAN: $5k → 17%MERITAN: $5k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $5k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $3k → 17%STREETS MINISTRIES: $3k → 17%AVE MARIA HOME: $10k → 17%AVE MARIA HOME: $10k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$1.1M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+15%

Still filing today

56%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +134%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $48k · revenue ×12
  • CC
    Camp Conquest
    3× · 2022–2024 · $37k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TL
    TRAIL LIFE USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +215%
  • CB
    CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Mississippi Methodist Hospital Rehabilitation Center Inc

In response to the love of god, the methodist rehabilitation center, is dedicated to the restoration and enhancement of the lives of those we serve. we are committed to excellence and leadership in the delivery of comprehensive…

Health
3
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
4
Warriors Center Memphis

Warriors Center Memphis is dedicated to assisting men overcome issues related to substance abuse and/or homelessness. We meet the needs of men such as clothing, shelter, education, job training and rehabilitation.

Housing & Shelter
5
Messiah Family Services

The organization's mission is to be "a ministry that responsibly enhances the lives of older adults with christ-like love."continued on schedule o.intentional and meaningful community life is central to achieving the organization's mission…

Health
6
Westminster Place

Westminster place, a faith based not for profit, creates vibrant communities for older adults that inspire wellness, independence, joy and security - enriching the lives of residents and their families.

Human Services
7
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
9
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
10
Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve our members and partners by improving the quality of life through regional economic prosperity.

—
11
Mississippi Methodist Senior Services Inc

Mississippi methodist senior services is dedicated to providing housing and personal care services to the elderly or disabled in the spirit of christian love.

Human Services
12
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Christian Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mifa Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $403,813 · OtherST ANN CATHOLIC SCHOOLBARTLETT HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS: $70,470 · OtherBARTLETT HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERSUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHISBARTLETT PERFORMING ARTS & CONFERENCE CENTER: $61,500 · OtherBARTLETT PERFORMING ARTS & CONFERENCE CENTEROAKLAND FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $37,000 · Other+30 more: $285,400 · Other+30 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $47,500 · EducationCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationWOODLAND PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,200 · EducationFayette Cares Inc: $27,500 · Human ServicesAVE MARIA HOME INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMERITAN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $70,000 · ReligionTRAIL LIFE USA INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF MEMPHIS INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyCamp Conquest: $37,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$928,183Education$83,700Human Services$77,500Religion$70,000Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$41,000Recreation & Sports$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Conquest: $37,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORPHEUM THEATRE GROUP: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFayette Cares Inc: $27,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVE MARIA HOME INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMemphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMemphis Zoological Society: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOODLAND PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERITAN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMPHIS BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF MEMPHIS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMethodist Healthcare Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MEMPHIS AND THE MID-SOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE MEMPHIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRhodes College: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLe Bonheur Children's Hospital Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TRAIL LIFE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Camp Conquest ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Fayette Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Brooks Museum of Art Inc ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S HAVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAND PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MERITAN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Methodist Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MEMPHIS AND THE MID-SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MIFA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS UNION MISSON ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE MEMPHIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN39.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Knapp Foundation · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Plough Foundation · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mid South · Crews Family Foundation · Belz Foundation · Lawrence Lewis Foundation · Deborah D Tipton Charitable Foundation · The Urban Child Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pk Seidman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pk Seidman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pk Seidman Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Pk Seidman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pk Seidman’s filings →

More from the funding graph