Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pittsfield High School Class of 1954 Scholarship Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of PITTSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 1954 SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
$3,869
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$27,956
MIDWEST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$18,064
QUINCY UNIVERSITY$14,718
MISSOURI S & T$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,600
JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE$6,571
UNIVERSITY OF SPA & COSMETOLOGY ART$5,000
LINCOLN LAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$3,869
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$3,679
BLESSING RIEMAN COLLEGE$3,282
PIKELAND UNIT SCHOOL DIST 10$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY$979
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSOURI S & T: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $10k → 21%TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 28%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $15k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $28k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $22k → 13%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%MONMOUTH COLLEGE: $6k → 16%MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%PIKELAND UNIT SCHOOL DIST 10: $111k → 17%UNIERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $7k → 19%MISSISSIPPI STATE: $7k → 24%MISSOURI S & T: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $10k → 21%MIDWEST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $18k → 11%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $13k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $15k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $18k → 13%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%PIKELAND SCHOOL: $85k → 17%UNIERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $6k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $10k → 11%GOLDFARB'S SCHOOL OF NURSING: $9k → 21%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $13k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $15k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $14k → 13%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%PIKELAND SCHOOL: $31k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $6k → 19%GOLDFARB'S SCHOOL OF NURSING: $6k → 21%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $10k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $10k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $7k → 13%BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%MALLORY JEREMY DAVIDSMEYER: $8k → 17%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $10k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $9k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $7k → 13%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $8k → 12%SIU - EDWARDSVILLE: $6k → 12%JOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE: $5k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $17k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%QUINCY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
IA
UT
NE
MO
AZ
KS
TN
SC
MS
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$939k · 32 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
32

Total granted

$939k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

41%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QU
    QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $82k · revenue +54%
  • IC
    ILLINOIS COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +28%
  • MU
    McKendree University
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +7%
  • MJ
    MR JOHN'S BEAUTY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
6
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
10
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
11
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
12
Drury University

Drury University is an independent university, church-related, grounded in the liberal arts tradition and committed to personalized education in a community of scholars who value the arts of teaching and learning. (Continued on Schedule O)

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis University and the most unlike its peers is Iowa Wesleyan University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIKELAND UNIT SCHOOL DIST 10 — $127,850 · OtherPIKELAND UNIT SCHOOL DIST 10PIKELAND SCHOOL — $119,450 · OtherPIKELAND SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $93,303 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGE — $77,443 · OtherJOHN WOOD COMM COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $46,842 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURITRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $28,500 · Other+47 more — $284,004 · Other+47 moreQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $81,935 · EducationQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATIONILLINOIS COLLEGE — $78,500 · EducationILLINOIS COLLEGEBRADLEY UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITYCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE — $16,500 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGEMcKendree University — $12,000 · EducationMONMOUTH COLLEGE — $11,999 · Education+11 more — $53,090 · Education+11 more
Other$777,392Education$294,024

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $81,935 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE — $78,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIowa Wesleyan University — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE — $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMcKendree University — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH COLLEGE — $11,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $6,539 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHannibal LaGrange University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $4,801 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Louis University — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Iowa Wesleyan University
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds McKendree University
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE
  • Who funds Roosevelt University
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM
  • Who funds Hannibal LaGrange University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · George & Hazel Barber Scholarship Trust · Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust Mercantile Bank Trustee · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Nick Carter Scholarship Fund · Lord Educational Fund · Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · Marquette Bank Education Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pittsfield High School Class of 1954 Scholarship Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph