Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marquette Bank Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.8MEmployment$146kRecreation & Sports$16kHealth$15kHuman Services$3kPublic Benefit$2kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k72 grants · $176k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$2,500
Median grant
17
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRISTO REY WORK STUDY PROGRAM$60,000
MOTHER MCAULEY LIBERAL ARTS HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
SAINT RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL$46,000
MARIST HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
OUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
SAINT ANN SCHOOL$2,500
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
LAKE FOREST COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA- CHAMPAIGN$2,500
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$2,500
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$2,500
THE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$2,500
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$2,500
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$2,500
NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $886 → 14%THE PORT MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 79 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

79 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
119

Total granted

$1.6M
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+16%

Still filing today

47%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SX
    SAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +26%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +25%
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    CHICAGO CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
3
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University and the most unlike its peers is The Port Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …School District FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr22%79%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr15%1%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr22%87%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/120
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,239

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 228 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/97
Grantees still filing
69/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $151,577 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISCRISTO REY WORK-STUDY PROGRAM — $145,570 · OtherCRISTO REY WORK-STUDY PROGRAMST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATION — $140,000 · OtherST RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL CORPORATIONMOTHER MCAULEY LIBERAL ARTS HIGH SCHOOL — $135,250 · OtherMOTHER MCAULEY LIBERAL ARTS HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS - URBANA-CHAMPAIGN — $60,000 · OtherSAINT RITA OF CASCIA HIGH SCHOOL — $46,000 · Other+116 more — $700,500 · Other+116 moreSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY — $89,500 · EducationSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITYDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $43,500 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $37,500 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOMarquette University — $32,500 · EducationMarquette UniversityDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY — $22,500 · EducationLewis University — $22,000 · Education+69 more — $335,000 · Education+69 moreAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation — $7,000 · HealthNorthwestern University — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,378,897Education$582,500Health$7,000Recreation & Sports$2,500Community Improvement$2,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY — $89,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $43,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $37,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $32,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLewis University — $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia College Chicago — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Louis University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $7,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCreighton University — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central College — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Lewis University
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Columbia College Chicago
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds National Louis University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame
  • Who funds Spelman College
  • Who funds University of Michigan

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International FoundationNY23.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Ernest Wentcher Educational Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc · Council of Independent Colleges · Helen V Brach Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marquette Bank Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Trustees of Boston College2% of income from government
  • Barry University Inc0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marquette Bank Education Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Marquette Bank Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 228 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph