Skip to content
Pink Tie 1000 Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pink Tie 1000 Foundation

The purpose for which the organization is formed is to support other qualified charitable organizations through financial assistance as deemed appropriate.

$277k
Granted FY2021
4
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$349kInternational$178kHuman Services$76kCommunity Improvement$47kPhilanthropy$44kRecreation & Sports$43kReligion$30kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2021 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $192,725, the rows itemized in this filing. The $276,977 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,252 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $168k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$500
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Mariano Rivera Foundation$168,475
SIBS Place$10,000
Boy Scouts of America$7,250
The Salvation Army$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%kids mobility network: $11k → 8%Scott J Beigel Memorial Fund Inc: $10k → 7%The Viscardi Center: $8k → 6%SIBS Place: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 5 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
26

Total granted

$299k
$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+43%

Still filing today

80%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $52k · revenue +91%
  • VL
    VISION LONG ISLAND INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $37k · revenue +55%
  • SC
    SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • SB
    Stony Brook Children's
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • TL
    The Leukemia & Lymphoma Socie
    one grant, 2018 · $63k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2019 · $55k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
4
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
5
Plainview Hospital

Plainview hospital is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
6
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
9
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
10
Hospice Care Network

Our mission is to enable persons to live with peace and dignity in a caring environment during the final stages of life by offering care and comfort to both them and to those whom they share their lives.

Human Services
11
Staten Island University Hospital Foundation

The mission of staten island university hospital's foundation is to achieve philanthropic relationships for support and endowment, providing highest quality care, services and state of the art equipment. philanthropy has played an…

Health
12
Central Suffolk Hospital

Central suffolk hospital ("csh") d/b/a peconic bay medical center ("pbmc") is a not-for-profit hospital consisting of acute health care, a skilled nursing facility and a certified home care agency. csh provides a full range of health care…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Services of Westchester Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Stony Brook Children's: $100,000 · OtherStony Brook Children'sThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Socie: $63,150 · OtherThe Leukemia & Lymphoma SociePGA Tour Foundation: $37,500 · OtherPGA Tour FoundationLong Island Council of Church: $30,000 · OtherLong Island Council of ChurchChad Strong Foundation: $27,000 · OtherChad Strong FoundationFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $22,500 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $21,360 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $19,000 · OtherTHE TOWNWIDE FUND OF HUNTINGTON INC: $17,000 · Other+7 more: $57,117 · Other+7 moreMARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATION: $178,475 · InternationalMARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FO…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $55,425 · HealthBLOOD CANCER…HOPEKIDS INC: $13,882 · HealthHOPEKIDS INCCENTRAL NASSAU GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthCENTRAL NASS…DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · HealthDIABETES RES…OLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthOLIVIA'S HOP…MICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $51,500 · PhilanthropyLONG ISLAND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $6,500 · PhilanthropyVISION LONG ISLAND INC: $37,000 · Community ImprovementTHE TIMOTHY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $6,500 · Community ImprovementKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $11,250 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSCOTT J BEIGEL MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesSUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $13,250 · Youth Development
Other$394,627International$178,475Health$91,307Philanthropy$58,000Community Improvement$53,500Human Services$38,750Youth Development$13,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATION: $178,475 over 2y, 11% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $55,425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $51,500 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetVISION LONG ISLAND INC: $37,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOWNWIDE FUND OF HUNTINGTON INC: $17,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $13,882 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $13,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL NASSAU GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSCOTT J BEIGEL MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSENSE OF SECURITY INC: $8,147 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetJOHN L STARKS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPACIFIC WILD ALLIANCE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $6,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVIA'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health…The New York Communit…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pink Tie 1000 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pink Tie 1000 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pink Tie 1000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home