Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pine Tree Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.0MArts & Culture$2.0MHuman Services$1.1MInternational$1.0MHousing & Shelter$875kEnvironment$820kHealth$598kRecreation & Sports$180kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $670k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDS$165,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$105,000
PROJECT HOME$100,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$100,000
CARE$50,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$50,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$50,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$50,000
A PRECIOUS CHILD$40,000
CCSA FOUNDATION$40,000
GEMMA SERVICES$30,000
SQUASH SMARTS$30,000
CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST$25,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$25,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $5k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $100k → 22%PATRIOT PAWS: $13k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $40k → 5%SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC: $10k → 10%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $5k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $50k → 22%PATRIOT PAWS: $10k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $40k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER: $15k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $60k → 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $30k → 5%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $15k → 5%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $50k → 7%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%GIRLS WHO CODE: $20k → 17%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%GIRLS WHO CODE: $20k → 17%GEMMA SERVICES: $30k → 10%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $50k → 22%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $10k → 22%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $10k → 22%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Pine Tree Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Pine Tree Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 53 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
11

Total granted

$10M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

70%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    3× · 2018–2020 · $900k · revenue +16%
  • TP
    THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $600k · revenue +72%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $460k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • BROAD STREET MINISTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -43%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
3
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
7
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
8
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
30/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $700,000 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $560,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $467,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODVOX AMA DEUS: $425,000 · OtherVOX AMA DEUSCHESTER CHARTER SCHOOLS FOR THE ARTS: $255,000 · OtherCHESTER CHARTER SCHOOLS FOR THE ARTSCRESTED BUTTE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $180,000 · OtherAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc: $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherCRESTED BUTTE ARTS CENTER: $145,000 · Other+28 more: $1,097,500 · Other+28 moreTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $900,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERTeach for America Inc: $800,000 · EducationTeach for America IncElevate 215: $500,000 · EducationElevate 215DUKE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · Education+3 more: $100,000 · EducationCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $460,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CR…Gemma Services: $180,000 · Human ServicesGemma Service…DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $155,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE…PROJECT HOME: $150,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CH…BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $50,000 · Human Services+5 more: $127,500 · Human Services+5 moreCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $410,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $275,000 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $37,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,000 · International+1 more: $12,500 · InternationalTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $600,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $145,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $395,000 · EnvironmentCRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $195,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc: $80,000 · EnvironmentNatural Lands Trust Inc: $75,000 · EnvironmentPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $235,000 · HealthPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $50,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · HealthCRESTED BUTTE STATE OF MIND: $12,500 · Health
Other$4,160,000Education$2,400,000Human Services$1,247,500International$765,000Arts & Culture$745,000Environment$745,000Health$317,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $900,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $800,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $600,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $560,000 over 7y, 69% of budgetElevate 215: $500,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $460,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetVOX AMA DEUS: $425,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $410,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $395,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $275,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $235,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $195,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetGemma Services: $180,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAdaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc: $180,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $155,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $145,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASHSMARTS INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCCSA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING INC: $40,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $37,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOME INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE STATE OF MIND: $12,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE GUNNISON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSecond Chance Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF COLORADO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKNIGHTS OF HEROES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Elevate 215 ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds VOX AMA DEUS ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Gemma Services ↗
  • Who funds Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds CCSA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO25× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Dea Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Caroline Alexander Buck Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Hamilton Family Charitable Trust · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pine Tree Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pine Tree Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pine Tree Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pine Tree Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pine Tree’s filings →

More from the funding graph