Skip to content
Pikeville Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Pikeville Medical Center Inc

The center's mission is to advance the health and well-being of our region through comprehensive care in a christian environment.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$257kEducation$120kPublic Safety & Disaster$77kPublic Benefit$50kEnvironment$31kReligion$11kArts & Culture$5kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $165,150, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,429,583 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,264,433 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$813M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC$75,000
PIKEVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS$40,000
SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$15,000
WYMT-TV MOUNTAIN BASKETBALL CLASSIC$10,000
CEDAR INC$9,150
THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS$8,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 29%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $5k → 29%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$581k · 8 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$581k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+69%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $182k · revenue +249%
  • PC
    PIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +79%
  • KC
    Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CO
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +34%
  • FA
    FIVCO AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Industrial Development Council

Development and educational opportunities to promote industrial and economic development in kentucky.

Community Improvement
2
Red River Economic Development

Economic Development and Tourism Promotion in Eastern Kentucky

Community Improvement
3
Kentucky Association of Conservation District Employees

Conservation education and promotion

Environment
4
Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to promote and support the development of strong businesses and a vibrant economy in the northern kentucky region, through leadership and advocacy, resulting in a better quality of life for all.

—
5
Southeast Kentucky Economic Development Corporation Inc

To facilitate the economic growth and development of the southern kentucky region.

Community Improvement
6
Kentucky Chamber of Commerce Executives

The kentucky chamber of commerce executives is the professional association of chamber of commerce executives in the state of kentucky. the purpose of the organization is to enhance the effectiveness and professionalism of the local…

Community Improvement
7
Kentucky Science Teachers Association

To promote the teaching of science

Community Improvement
8
Kentucky Association for Economic Development Inc

Our purpose is to educate, advocate and connect with our members on issues that are important to the economic development in the commonwealth of kentucky.

Community Improvement
9
Graves County Economic Development

To actively search for new companies and industries to locate in the mayfield, ky and graves county, ky area for economic development.

Community Improvement
10
Kentucky Valley Educational Cooperative Inc

Kentucky valley educational cooperative, (kvec), is a private non-profit cooperative under the irs code section 501(c) (3). kvec is one of eight education cooperatives in kentucky consisting of 26 member school districts. the cooperative…

Education
11
Greater Augusta Regional Chamber of Commerce Foundation
—
12
Southern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce Inc

The Southern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce primary mission is to keep their members informed of current events and law changes that effect their businesses. They also support an educational effort to high school students to make them better…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $98,500 · OtherPIKE COUNTY SCHOOLSCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY: $75,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKYPIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $69,850 · OtherPIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEPIKEVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $54,167 · OtherPIKEVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLSPikeville Fire Department: $52,000 · OtherPikeville Fire DepartmentCEDAR INC: $40,024 · OtherCEDAR INC+3 more: $23,000 · Other+3 moreSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC: $181,650 · Community ImprovementSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INCONE EAST KENTUCKY CORPORATION ONE EAST KENTUCKY: $57,750 · Community ImprovementONE EAST KENTUCKY CORPORATION ONE EAST KEN…Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc: $27,500 · Community ImprovementKentucky Chamber Foundation IncCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $10,698 · Human ServicesCOWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWYMT TV MOUNTAIN BASKETBALL CLASSIC: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $1,000 · EducationCHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INC: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,000 · Health
Other$412,541Community Improvement$266,900Human Services$15,698Education$11,000Youth Development$7,000Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC: $181,650 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $69,850 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetONE EAST KENTUCKY CORPORATION ONE EAST KENTUCKY: $57,750 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetCEDAR INC: $40,024 over 3y, 12% of budgetKentucky Chamber Foundation Inc: $27,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $10,698 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWYMT TV MOUNTAIN BASKETBALL CLASSIC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Steele-Reese Foun…Foundation for Appala…Appalachian Regional …Charities Aid Foundat…
The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004IL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004 · Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky Inc · Appalachian Regional Healthcare · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pikeville Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pikeville Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pikeville Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home