Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Piedmont Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$411k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$624kArts & Culture$458kEducation$406kYouth Development$345kHuman Services$305kEnvironment$200kReligion$185kCommunity Improvement$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $338k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY$45,000
YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE$30,000
BREAKTHRU HOUSE$30,000
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HOME$25,000
GLENN MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ATL AREA COUNCIL$25,000
WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER$25,000
GEORGIA MUSEUM OF ART$22,500
ST SIMONS LAND TRUST$15,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$12,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTA$12,500
STURDIVANT MUSEUM ASSOCIATION$10,000
AMERICAN RIVERS ANGLERS FUND$10,000
SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CRADDOCK CENTER: $3k → 14%CROSSROADS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $10k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $10k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $10k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $5k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $5k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $3k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $3k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
VA
SC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 44 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
4

Total granted

$2.6M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+25%

Still filing today

55%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $225k · revenue +44%
  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $177k · revenue +54%
  • Washington and Lee University
    8× · 2018–2025 · $120k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • BH
    BREAKTHRU HOUSECAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • WF
    WESTSIDE FUTURE FUNDAPS WASHINGTON CLUSTER PART
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CC
    CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCYDCR LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atlanta Historical Society Inc

Atlanta history center seeks to connect people, history, and culture to build a stronger community. through exhibitions, collections, historic houses, gardens, archives, educational school tours, public programs, and digital and virtual…

Arts & Culture
2
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

3
Augusta Health Care Inc

The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.

Health
4
Spelman College

Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.

Education
5
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
10
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Gateway Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr10%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr10%54%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
19%
5,005/25,827

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ATL AREA COUNCIL — $186,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ATL AREA COUNCILOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HOME — $186,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP HOMEGLEN MEMORIAL METHODIST CHURCH — $170,000 · OtherGLEN MEMORIAL METHODIST CHURCHGEORGIA MUSEUM OF ART — $128,000 · OtherGEORGIA MUSEUM OF ARTCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA — $102,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTA — $85,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTAEMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — $80,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITALSTURDIVANT MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $62,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $60,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL THEOLOGY — $57,500 · OtherLITERACY ACTION INC — $50,000 · OtherMERIDIAN HERALD INC — $50,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF N CENTRAL GA NEWTON COUNTY CLUB — $50,000 · OtherBREAKTHRU HOUSECAPITAL CAMPAIGN — $50,000 · Other+20 more — $133,000 · Other+20 moreBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC — $225,000 · HealthBREAKTHRU HOUS…CANTERBURY COURT INC — $73,000 · HealthCANTERBURY COU…FOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS INC — $42,500 · HealthFOUNDATION OF …ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $177,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WO…ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC — $59,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTA BEL…Morgan County Foundation Inc — $40,000 · Arts & CultureMorgan Coun…Washington and Lee University — $120,000 · EducationWashington…THE SCHENCK SCHOOL — $53,000 · EducationTHE SCHENC…YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationYOUNG HARR…Emory University — $30,000 · EducationEmory Univ…+1 more — $8,000 · EducationST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC — $95,000 · EnvironmentTREES ATLANTA INC — $66,500 · EnvironmentChewonki Foundation Inc — $17,000 · EnvironmentNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $49,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $40,000 · Human ServicesThe Craddock Center Inc — $37,500 · Human Services+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropySHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,450,500Health$340,500Arts & Culture$276,000Education$241,000Environment$178,500Human Services$128,000Philanthropy$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREAKTHRU HOUSE INC — $225,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $177,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC — $95,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCANTERBURY COURT INC — $73,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTREES ATLANTA INC — $66,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC — $59,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SCHENCK SCHOOL — $53,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY ACTION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMERIDIAN HERALD INC — $50,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $49,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS INC — $42,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan County Foundation Inc — $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetThe Craddock Center Inc — $37,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetEmory University — $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc — $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC — $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HARRISON PARK INC — $5,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAcorns to Oaks Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrossroads Community Ministries Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATEWAY CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHRU HOUSE INC
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University
  • Who funds ST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds CANTERBURY COURT INC
  • Who funds TREES ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds THE SCHENCK SCHOOL
  • Who funds LITERACY ACTION INC
  • Who funds MERIDIAN HERALD INC
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds Morgan County Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The Craddock Center Inc
  • Who funds YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc
  • Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds University of Chicago

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA33.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Fraser-Parker Foundation · Tuw Thomas H Pitts · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · The Imlay Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · The Waterfall Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Piedmont Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Piedmont Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Piedmont Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph