Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Phyllis W McGillicuddy Charitable Trust Co

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192025.

Education$245kHealth$242kOther$200k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORCESTER ACADEMY$40,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$15,000
CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
HARVARD ST NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CNTR$10,000
WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC$10,000
CAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE$10,000
CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MA$10,000
HEARTS & NOSES CLOWN TROUPE INC$7,500
THE HERREN PROJECT$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HEARTS & NOSES HOSPITAL CLOWN TROUPE: $8k → 7%CAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE: $10k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $10k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $40k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $15k → 16%THE HERREN PROJECT: $10k → 7%HEARTS & NOSES CLOWN TROUPE INC: $8k → 7%CAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE: $5k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $10k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $40k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $15k → 16%THE HERREN PROJECT: $8k → 7%HEARTS & NOSES HOSPITAL CLOWN TROUPE: $7k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $8k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $40k → 11%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $15k → 16%THE HERREN PROJECT: $7k → 7%HEARTS & NOSES HOSPITAL CLOWN TROUPE: $7k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $8k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $35k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15k → 16%THE HERREN PROJECT: $6k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $8k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $30k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $13k → 16%THE HERREN PROJECT: $6k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $8k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $25k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%WORCESTER ACADEMY: $20k → 11%HARVARD ST NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CNTR: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10k → 7%CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MA: $10k → 7%CENTERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $9k → 8%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10k → 7%CENTERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $8k → 8%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MA: $10k → 7%CENTERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 8%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$677k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$677k
$10k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WORCESTER ACADEMY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $230k · revenue +1%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    6× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +55%
  • CO
    CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • HS
    HARVARD ST NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CNTR
    one grant, 2025 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Boston Children's Network Specialty Physicians Inc

BCNSP supports the following three pillars of Boston Children's Hospital's four-part mission: (1) providing care to individuals in the community, (2) improving clinical care to its patients, and (3) educating and training clinicians. In…

Health
3
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

4
Boston Community Pediatrics Inc

Boston community pediatrics (bcp) provides ambulatory pediatric and related health care services to the residents of boston, massachusetts, and surrounding communities. bcp is a new model of innovative pediatric healthcare that addresses…

Health
5
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
6
Children's Medical Center Corporation

To operate exclusively for the benefit of The Children's Hospital Corporation and its affiliated organizations in the conduct of their charitable, educational and scientific functions.

Health
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
9
Children's Hospital Pediatric Associates Inc

The Foundation provides medical and health care services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital, and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
10
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
11
Franciscan Hospital for Children

To create a compassionate and supportive environment where children with complex medical, mental health, and educational needs receive expert, specialized care. Our dedicated team is committed to excellence, innovation, and empowering…

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cape Cod Children's Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORCESTER ACADEMY — $230,000 · EducationWORCESTER ACADEMYCAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $15,000 · EducationCAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INCChildren's Hospital Corporation — $83,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $69,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACH…THE HERREN PROJECT — $46,500 · HealthTHE HERREN PROJECTHearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc — $43,000 · HealthHearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe …CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $51,000 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $36,500 · OtherWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INCCENTERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $32,000 · OtherCENTERVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYHARVARD ST NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CNTR — $10,000 · Other
Education$245,000Health$242,000Other$199,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORCESTER ACADEMY — $230,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $83,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $69,500 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $51,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT — $46,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc — $43,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $36,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORCESTER ACADEMY
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT
  • Who funds Hearts and Noses Hospital Clown Troupe Inc
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC
  • Who funds CAPE COD CHILDREN'S PLACE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phyllis W McGillicuddy Charitable Trust Co funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Cape Cod Children's Place Inc47% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Phyllis W McGillicuddy Charitable Trust Co?

Find your warmest path to Phyllis W McGillicuddy Charitable Trust Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph