· Private foundation
Philo & Sarah Blaisdell Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k101 grants · $150k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $220k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $281k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE | $130,500 |
| CITY OF BRADFORD OECD | $100,000 |
| FUTURES REHABILITATION CENTER INC | $50,500 |
| BRADFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| BRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DESTINATIONS BRADFORD | $20,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP TABLE | $18,260 |
| BRADFORD LEARNING CENTER | $15,000 |
| YMCA OF OLEAN NY AND BRADFORD PA | $13,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BRADFORD AREA INC | $12,200 |
| BRADFORD CREATIVE AND PERFORMING AR | $11,500 |
| CARE FOR CHILDREN | $10,500 |
| EVERGREEN ELM INC | $10,000 |
| BRADFORD AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
176 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2025, 122 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BRADFORD9× · 2017–2025 · $498k · revenue +19%
- BABRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE6× · 2020–2025 · $273k · revenue +638%
- BEBRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $199k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- BFBASD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $50k
- MOMEALS ON WHEELSone grant, 2023 · $40k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower our neighbors to foster a healthy community through education, collaboration, advocacy and mobilization of resources
The mission of this fire company is to prevent and extinguish fires in the borough of bradford woods, pa and assist neighboring fire companies as needed.
Provide quality, diverse arts programming to impact our communities and enrich people's lives in the twin tiers
Multi-specialty physician group practice organized to serve patients in bradford, pa, and the surrounding area.
Collect, display, and share history
Formed for the purpose of engaging in hunting, fishing, and shooting mark, as well as taking part in all other forms of outdoor sport and for the preservation of the wile life, streams and forest of pennsylvania
The west bradford fire company is a volunteer fire company providing fire suppression/rescue and prevention services to west bradford, east bradford and newlin townships all in the state of pennsylvania. the fire company provides mutual…
To provide charitable contributions for the good of children in the pittsburgh and surrounding areas.
Outdoor activities to promote enjoyment of outdoor sports to include trapshooting & shooting.
Provide food to those of need.
To provide education, guidance, and training to those members of the community who may be at risk of not maintaining a reasonable standard of living and who cannot acquire these necessary skills through traditional channels
To provide a compassionate community where loving care enables aged and indigent individuals from meriden and connecticut to live with dignity in a secure, homelike environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dickinson Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eldred World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 490 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BRADFORD ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD AREA ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP TABLE ↗
- Who funds DESTINATIONS BRADFORD ↗
- Who funds CARE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN ELM INC ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds FUTURES REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRADFORD AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF MCKEAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds POTTER CO EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds MCKEAN CO PA SOCIETY OF THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Bradford Landmark Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Northern Alleghenies · Pembroke Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Bradford Area Inc · Mukaiyama Rice Foundation · Upmc Group · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Philo & Sarah Blaisdell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Philo & Sarah Blaisdell Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Philo & Sarah Blaisdell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.