Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Phillips Foundation Elizabeth G McKown Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of PHILLIPS FOUNDATION ELIZABETH G MCKOWN TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE$37,529
LOW COUNTRY CARES$12,529
MEYER CENTER$10,000
GREENVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
GREER FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
GREEN HEART PROJECT$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,255
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREER RELIEF: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$110k · 7 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$110k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

57%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +67%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +220%
  • TS
    THE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    2× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • LO
    LOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue -19%
  • FT
    FIRST TEE
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TN
    THE NAOMI PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
5
Goodwill Industries of Central North Car

Goodwill industries of central north carolina, inc.'s mission is improving lives and enriching communities through the power of work

Employment
6
Goodwill of the Coastal Empire Inc

Our commitment is to provide the individual support, meaningful training and employment services to people to remove barriers and close skill gaps so that individuals build brighter futures.

Employment
7
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of Greenwood County

The mission of the food bank of greenwood county is to reduce hunger through community cooperation, effectively distributing donated grocery products and perishable foods, and making the best possible use of all available resources.

Food & Nutrition
9
Santee Electric Cooperative Inc

To provide quality service and products to meet the energy needs of our members at a competitive price consistent with sound business practices, while enhancing the quality of life in our service area through the support of economic, civic…

10
Southeast Missouri Food Bank Inc

The mission of the southeast missouri food bank is to promote food recovery; acquire and distribute food and household products; and provide community leadership and education on issues of hunger and poverty in an effort to alleviate…

Food & Nutrition
11
Meals On Wheels of Greenville Inc

Meals on wheels of greenville, inc. enhances the quality of life of homebound individuals by providing nutritious meals, personal contact, and related services.

Food & Nutrition
12
Palmetto Goodwill Services

Palmetto goodwill service's (goodwill) mission is changing lives by providing equitable access to training, education, and employment. goodwill enriches the lives of people while providing quality service to customers. work and training…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greer Community Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green Heart Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $44,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDRENGREER FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherGREER FIRST BAPTIST CHURCHFIRST TEE — $15,000 · OtherFIRST TEEMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $14,300 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCLOW COUNTRY CARES — $12,529 · OtherLOW COUNTRY CARESASHLEY RIVER BAPTIST CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherASHLEY RIVER BAPTIST CHURCHLOW COUNTRY YOUTHY SERVICES — $5,000 · Other+11 more — $17,898 · Other+11 moreSUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE — $37,529 · Community ImprovementSUSTAINABILITY IN…LOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF — $16,544 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY …MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $2,250 · Human ServicesMIRACLE HIL…GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesGREER COMMU…GREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesGREER RELIE…SAFE HARBOR INC — $1,878 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR…THE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $12,500 · AnimalsCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NAOMI PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · Education
Other$143,727Community Improvement$37,529Human Services$24,672Animals$12,500Arts & Culture$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $44,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF — $16,544 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $14,300 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAOMI PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGreen Heart Project Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $1,878 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIMESTONE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF UPSTATEMIDLANDS SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC21× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Don Waggoner & Zelma Waggoner Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Spartanburg County Foundation · Countybank Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phillips Foundation Elizabeth G McKown Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph