Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Phillips Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$199kEnvironment$185kReligion$80kHousing & Shelter$71kRecreation & Sports$27kFood & Nutrition$12kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$14,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC$24,000
TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS$14,400
IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL$14,400
THE BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE$14,400
RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC$14,400
ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL$14,400
HEALING MEALS COMM PROJECT$12,000
ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TMM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $20k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $20k → 28%SAFE HARBOR: $15k → 7%HEALING MEALS COMM PROJECT: $12k → 11%ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $15k → 12%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $32k → 6%BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $23k → 7%TMM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $14k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $16k → 28%ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $12k → 12%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $29k → 6%THE BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $20k → 7%TMM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $13k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $14k → 28%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $24k → 6%THE BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $14k → 7%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $20k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $10k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $14k → 28%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $14k → 6%THE BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $10k → 7%OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $16k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $4k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 28%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $9k → 6%BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $7k → 7%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $14k → 15%RIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $4k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 28%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $9k → 6%BIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE: $6k → 7%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $14k → 15%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $13k → 15%OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8k → 15%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $4k → 15%OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4k → 15%OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4k → 15%TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$559k · 11 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$559k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $116k · revenue +57%
  • TB
    TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +176%
  • ID
    IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
3
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
4
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

5
La Frontera Housing Inc

Housing for persons with disabilities.

Housing & Shelter
6
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc

Seeking a more compassionate and just world, Habitat for Humanity Tucson brings people together to build homes, community and hope.

Housing & Shelter
8
B'nai B'rith Covenant House of Tucson Arizona Inc C/O Biltmore Properties

B'nai b'rith covenant house provides affordable independent housing for seniors. we develop programs and projects to enrich the residents' lives while fostering independence and dignity.

Housing & Shelter
9
The Centers for Habilitationtch

Finding creative and innovative ways to provide hope and purpose for individuals with disabilities.

Employment
10
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

11
Interfaith Sanctuary Housing Services Inc

Interfaith sanctuary is a collaboration of people of faith and people of goodwill who provide shelter and services to the homeless. we provide overnight shelter for men, women, and children, and supportive services to promote greater…

Housing & Shelter
12
Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intermountain Centers for Human Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hilton Head Heroes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $116,172 · OtherGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INCBIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINE — $80,089 · OtherBIBLE SOCIETY OF MAINEST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL — $74,107 · OtherST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOLRIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INC — $64,865 · OtherRIM COUNTRY LITERACY PROGRAM INCOur Family Services Inc — $32,207 · OtherOur Family Services IncTMM Family Services Inc — $24,086 · OtherTMM Family Services IncSAFE HARBOR INC — $15,000 · Other+1 more — $12,000 · OtherTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS — $68,865 · EnvironmentTUCSON BOTANI…IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL — $60,107 · EducationIMAGO DEI M…ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO — $27,000 · Recreation & SportsINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesHILTON HEAD HEROES INC — $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$418,526Environment$68,865Education$60,107Recreation & Sports$27,000Human Services$6,500Philanthropy$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $116,172 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS — $68,865 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL — $60,107 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOur Family Services Inc — $32,207 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO — $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTMM Family Services Inc — $24,086 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILTON HEAD HEROES INC — $5,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS
  • Who funds IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds Our Family Services Inc
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO
  • Who funds TMM Family Services Inc
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD HEROES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phillips Family Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph