· Public charity
Pet Care Foundation
The organization is dedicated to the advocacy of shelter animals in los angeles city and los angeles county.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $320,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $345,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $265k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KITTEN RESCUE | $35,000 |
| FIXNATION | $30,000 |
| LANCE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES | $25,000 |
| STRAY CAT ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| BETTER TOGETHER FOREVER | $23,000 |
| HEAVEN ON EARTH | $15,000 |
| WESTSIDE GERMAN SHEPHARD RESCUE | $14,000 |
| COMMUNITY MEDICAL MEDICINE PROJECT | $12,500 |
| LOS ANGELES ANIMAL SERVICES | $10,000 |
| AMANDA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| WAGS & WALKS | $10,000 |
| ANIMALS IN NEED RESCUE NETWORK | $10,000 |
| KITTY BUNGALOW | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
To rescue abandoned and displaced cats and dogs, bring them back to health, provide all medical and prepare them for their new home
Carson Cats is dedicated to rescuing cats and kittens from the 6 Los Angeles County shelters, specifically Carson Shelter.
Animal care and rescue
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
To rescue animals, with last chances at local, Southern California animal shelters. Once rescued, we rehabilitate the animals to make for a smoother transition to their forever homes. We strive to connect the animals we rescue with the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kitten Rescue and the most unlike its peers is Rescues Rock Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KITTEN RESCUE ↗
- Who funds FixNation Inc ↗
- Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES INC D/B/A SHELTER HOPE PET SHOP ↗
- Who funds STRAY CAT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER ↗
- Who funds Heaven on Earth Society for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
- Who funds KITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS ↗
- Who funds Animals In Need Rescue Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Wags and Walks ↗
- Who funds THE AMANDA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAISY SENIOR DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARTINS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KITT CRUSADERS INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUES ROCK INC ↗
- Who funds Downtown Dog Rescue ↗
- Who funds GRAND-PAWS SENIOR SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE TRAIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The Annenberg Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Diane Warren Foundation · Community Outreach Promoting Emergency Preparedness · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Petco Love · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pet Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pet Care Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pet Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.