· Public charity
Pesi Inc
Pesi's mission is to educate and instruct professionals including but not limited to those in the fields of mental health, health care, education, and human services in all 50 states and over 140 countries around the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $502,239 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $569,004 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,765 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $409k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAU CLAIRE COUNTY HUMANE ASSOCIATION | $167,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| CITY OF EAU CLAIRE | $116,723 |
| PABLO CENTER AT THE CONFLUENCE | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $33,516 |
| TRAUMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $417k · revenue +3%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +46%
- HGHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC2× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $127k
- TOTASTE OF THE VALLEY - CHIPPEWA VALLEY AFTER HOURS ROTARY CLUBone grant, 2022 · $20k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF EAU CLAIRE POLICE DEPTone grant, 2023 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The eau claire area chamber of commerce, a not-for-profit business membership organization with steady membership around 1,200 members, is the advocate of business striving to enhance and protect the business environment and quality of…
The university of wisconsin-eau claire foundation, inc. has as its primary mission the stewardship of private funds donated to the foundation for the benefit of the university. we do this with fiscal integrity and respect for our valued…
Advance economic prosperity through business and job growth. the eau claire area economic development corporation's purpose is to create and implement strategies to attract and grow businesses, investment, and talent to our service area.
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
To provide effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives by administering charitable funds that distribute grants and scholarships to benefit the citizens of kane and kendall counties of illinois…
To receive and administer funds for educational and charitable purposes.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
To operate exclusively for, charitable, or other exempt purpose by acting for the benefit of performing functions of, or carrying out the charitable or other exempt purposes of the community foundation of st. clair county.
The greater cedar rapids community foundation (the community foundation) partners with donors, funders, and other community collaborators to achieve high-impact philanthropy, supports nonprofit organizations that address our community's…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…
To enhance and provide assistance for educational and other related programs of cayuga community college.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Chippewa Co and the most unlike its peers is Refuge Farms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRAUMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SEYMOUR BALL CLUBS ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CHIPPEWA CO ↗
- Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Pablo Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Ba Mason Trust · Royal Credit Union · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pesi Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pesi Inc?
Find your warmest path to Pesi Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.