Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$56kEnvironment$42kAnimals$25kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$17kCommunity Improvement$13kCivil Rights$7kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$350
Median grant
8
States reached
$428k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$4,000
SACNAS$3,500
THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$2,900
ACLU$1,400
GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION$1,000
JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
COMMUNITY$650
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
Individual grant recipient$450
ENGLERT THEATER$350
DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$350
FREE MEDICAL CLINIC$350
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF IOWA$350
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $300 → 15%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD: $250 → 15%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD: $250 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $150 → 15%IOWA CITY HOSPICE: $150 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
NE
AR
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$207k · 32 repeat orgs$640 to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
1

Total granted

$207k
$400

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IN
    IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +80%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +43%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHICANOS AND NATIVE AMERICANS IN SCIENCE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • EF
    EXTEND-A-DREAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
2
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
3
Iowa Citizen Action Network

To promote social, economic and environmental justice.

—
4
Iowa Bird Rehabilitation

The organization's mission is to address the immediate needs of sick, injured, and orphaned wild birds, with the goal to return them to the wild and help educate and bring awareness to the global issue that birds are dissappearing at an…

Animals
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
6
Intertribal Agriculture Council

The intertribal agriculture council was founded in 1987 to pursue and promote the conservation, development and use of our agricultural resources of american indian and alaska native tribes.

—
7
Iowa Association of Business and Industry

To nurture a favorable business, economic, governmental, and social climate within the state of iowa so our citizens can have the opportunity to enjoy the highest possible quality of life.

—
8
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
9
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
10
Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa

The independent insurance agents of iowa will be an unrelenting advocate of the business, professional and political interests of its members; doing so by working in the public's interest and with the highest ethical standards.

—
11
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
12
Iowa Medical Society

Our mission is to advance the practice of medicine through advocacy, education, and engagement with physicians throughout iowa to ensure the highest quality of care for the patients they serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Amazon Medical Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $37,595 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONJOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,150 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONACLU: $6,900 · OtherACLUPRELUDE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,050 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF NEBRASKA: $3,900 · Other+19 more: $30,410 · Other+19 moreIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $42,000 · EnvironmentIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE …THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $18,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD AN…DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3,150 · AnimalsDETROIT ZOO…SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHICANOS AND NATIVE AMERICANS IN SCIENCE: $18,000 · Science & TechSOCIETY F…GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalAMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT INC: $1,250 · InternationalIOWA CITY HOSPICE INC: $2,400 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $500 · Human Services
Other$110,005Environment$42,000Animals$21,150Science & Tech$18,000Education$9,000International$4,250Human Services$2,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHICANOS AND NATIVE AMERICANS IN SCIENCE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetPRELUDE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF NEBRASKA: $3,900 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA CITY HOSPICE INC: $2,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GOOD IOWA: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEXTEND THE DREAM FOUNDATION: $800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetIOWA POLICY PROJECT: $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE CO: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHICANOS AND NATIVE AMERICANS IN SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRELUDE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA CITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON MEDICAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GOOD IOWA ↗
  • Who funds EXTEND THE DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA POLICY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE CO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Johnson CountyIA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Johnson County · The Kenneth K Kinsey Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph