Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perrin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$360kReligion$254kPhilanthropy$117kAnimals$49kPublic Benefit$20kHuman Services$3kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $137k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPE$43,334
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA$29,000
UNIVERSITY OF LIGGETT SCHOOL$25,000
ST FRANCES OF ASSIAI$20,140
ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS$20,000
TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$2,500
DIOCESE OF DES MOINES$1,000
URBAN BICYCLE FOOD MINISTRY$1,000
UNITED FEDERATION OF DOLL CLUBS$500
ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arizona Animal Welfare League & SPCA: $10k → 11%Paws New England: $20k → 8%ACPC: $3k → 14%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $20k → 14%LUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPE: $43k → 5%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA: $29k → 17%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $63k → 21%Cost of Freedom Inc: $10k → 6%TUCK Annual Giving: $3k → 10%Paws New England: $10k → 8%ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $11k → 14%ST FRANCES OF ASSIAI: $31k → 5%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA: $27k → 17%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $59k → 21%Cost of Freedom Inc: $10k → 6%TUCK Annual Giving: $3k → 10%ECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIP: $24k → 11%ST FRANCES OF ASSIAI: $20k → 5%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA: $26k → 17%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $35k → 21%TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $3k → 10%ECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIP: $16k → 11%ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $11k → 14%ST FRANCES OF ASSIAI: $20k → 5%United Way of Central Iowa: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $3k → 10%ECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIP: $12k → 11%St Frances of Assiai: $19k → 5%United Way of Central Iowa: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%TUCK Annual Giving: $3k → 10%ECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIP: $9k → 11%ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $3k → 14%LUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPE: $10k → 5%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $3k → 10%LUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPE: $10k → 5%Blank Park Zoo: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $3k → 14%St Frances of Assiai: $10k → 5%UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%ST FRANCES OF ASSISI: $5k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF LIGGETT SCHOOL: $25k → 21%ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $3k → 14%ST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $3k → 14%Des Moines Christian School: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
CA
MO
AZ
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$789k · 14 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$789k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+42%

Still filing today

43%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +28%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $116k · revenue -20%
  • SF
    ST FRANCES OF ASSIAI
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k

Funded once

  • SF
    ST FRANCES OF ASSISI
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BP
    BLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • DM
    DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
2
Adams County Pet Rescue

Rescue, care, and find homes for abandoned and/or abused animals.

Animals
3
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
4
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
5
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
6
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
7
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
8
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
9
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
10
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
11
Paws With a Cause

To transform lives and strengthen communities through partnerships with custom trained working dogs.

Human Services
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Des Moines Christian Schools and the most unlike its peers is Des Moines Golf and Country Club Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA — $116,275 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWAST FRANCES OF ASSIAI — $99,991 · OtherST FRANCES OF ASSIAILUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPE — $63,401 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH OF HOPEECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIP — $60,500 · OtherECCLESIA CHURCH AT THE CHIPST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY — $21,500 · OtherST PETER VIETNAMESE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY+17 more — $38,235 · Other+17 moreUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL — $307,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOLST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS — $37,500 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS+2 more — $3,000 · EducationPaws New England — $30,000 · AnimalsTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE — $11,000 · AnimalsBLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Animals+2 more — $1,500 · AnimalsCOST OF FREEDOM INC — $20,000 · Public BenefitUNITED WAY OF STORY COUNTY INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropySTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC — $1,000 · HealthThe Guardsmen — $250 · Youth Development
Other$399,902Education$347,500Animals$47,500Public Benefit$20,000Philanthropy$1,000Health$1,000Youth Development$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL — $307,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA — $116,275 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS — $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPaws New England — $30,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE — $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetReigning Grace Ranch — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF STORY COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMES PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guardsmen — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS
  • Who funds Paws New England
  • Who funds COST OF FREEDOM INC
  • Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE
  • Who funds BLANK PARK ZOO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS
  • Who funds DES MOINES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Reigning Grace Ranch
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF STORY COUNTY INC
  • Who funds STRANDS OF STRENGTH INC
  • Who funds PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE
  • Who funds AMES PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank
  • Who funds The Guardsmen

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · American Endowment Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perrin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph