Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perlman Family Foundation Founded by Anita and Louis Perlman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$795k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$995kReligion$859kSocial Science$600kHealth$540kEducation$295kInternational$280kArts & Culture$212kCivil Rights$153kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $297k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $491k
$45,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$139,000
OHR TORAH STONE$120,000
WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$100,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$82,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS$50,000
IMPACT ISRAEL$47,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$45,000
NORTON & ELAINE SARNOFF CENTER FOR JEWISH GENETICS$45,000
ALAIN LOCKE CHARTER SCHOOL$39,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY$31,000
INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY$25,000
FIEDLER HILLEL AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$24,000
COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES$20,000
JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA$10,000
ISRAEL TENNIS & EDUCATION CENTERS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%MISERICORDIA HOME: $3k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $3k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 21 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$4.0M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+56%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2019–2025 · $834k · revenue +57%
  • OT
    Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel
    6× · 2019–2025 · $665k · revenue +53%
  • AL
    Alain Locke Charter School
    6× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +56%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IP
    ISRAEL PARASPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
8
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
American Jewish University

American jewish university (aju) advances and elevates the jewish journey of individuals, organizations and our community through excellence in scholarship, teaching, engaged conversation, and outreach. aju is a thriving center of jewish…

Education
11
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
12
Wisdom Without Walls Inc

Wisdom without walls is a nonprofit, nondenominational, online learning community that hosts intimate conversations with the most prominent voices in contemporary jewish thought, fostering discussions without ideological barriers.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Tennis Centers Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $600,000 · OtherWEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCENORTON & ELAINE SARNOFF CENTER FOR JEWISH GENETICS: $255,000 · OtherNORTON & ELAINE SARNOFF CENTER FOR JEWISH GENET…ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $250,000 · OtherANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $161,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTYFIEDLER HILLEL AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $109,000 · OtherFIEDLER HILLEL AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITYYEMIN ORDE: $80,000 · OtherBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $110,000 · OtherBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $60,000 · Other+9 more: $170,000 · Other+9 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $834,300 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF …Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $665,000 · ReligionOhr Torah Stone In…INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC: $25,000 · ReligionAlain Locke Charter School: $200,000 · EducationCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $95,000 · EducationIMPACTISRAEL INC: $135,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $125,000 · InternationalISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $141,800 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $153,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,795,000Philanthropy$834,300Religion$690,000Education$295,000International$280,000Arts & Culture$191,800Civil Rights$153,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $834,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $665,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetAlain Locke Charter School: $200,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $153,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $141,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $135,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $110,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $95,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWellness House: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds Alain Locke Charter School ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Circle of Service FoundationIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Circle of Service Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perlman Family Foundation Founded by Anita and Louis Perlman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perlman Family Foundation Founded by Anita and Louis Perlman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perlman Family Foundation Founded by Anita and Louis Perlman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph