· Private foundation
Peravid Foundation Agency
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k40 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $178k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUTHRIE THEATRE | $105,000 |
| ARTS PARTNERSHIP | $75,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS | $60,000 |
| BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLAB | $40,000 |
| ORDWAY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS | $35,000 |
| TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NANTUCKET | $17,500 |
| PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES | $15,000 |
| NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| THE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| ST PAUL ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| MINNESOTA OPERA | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MN ND & SD | $10,000 |
| NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| NANTUCKET LAND COUNCIL | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCORDWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS5× · 2020–2024 · $236k · revenue +27%
- MSMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS5× · 2020–2024 · $212k · revenue +73%
- TCTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $102k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- BIBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +36%
- PNPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue 0%
- SPSAINT PAUL MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
The guthrie theater engages exceptional theater artists in the exploration of both classic and contemporary plays, connecting the community we serve to one another and to the world. through its extraordinary artists, staff and facility,…
Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORDWAY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds The Arts Partnership ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
- Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds The Minnesota Opera ↗
- Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds VOCALESSENCE ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MILKWEED EDITIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F ↗
- Who funds THE FILM SOCIETY OF MINNEAPOLIS ST PAUL ↗
- Who funds Highpoint Center for Printmaking ↗
- Who funds ACKNOW COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds Lake Street Council ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Knox Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Target Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · George Family Foundation · Hb Fuller Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peravid Foundation Agency funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peravid Foundation Agency?
Find your warmest path to Peravid Foundation Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.