How much did PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST grant in FY2025?

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST reported 59 grants totaling $40,998,372 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST based?

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST is based in PA.

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST

Pcadv is the oldest statewide domestic violence coalition in the nation.

$41M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$2.1M

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$161MHealth$11MCrime & Legal$1.9MEnvironment$1.9MOther$52M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

supportive counselingclient

2020

casesnorth pennpenn legalprioritieslegal advocates

2021

casesnorth pennpenn legalprioritieslegal advocates

2022

casesnorth pennpenn legalprioritieslegal advocates

2023

casesnorth pennpenn legalprioritieslegal advocates

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$50k–250k4 grants · $750k
$250k+55 grants · $40M

$601,314

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY$2,056,427
WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC$1,934,067
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER SOUTHWESTERN PA$1,573,928
VICTIM'S INTERVENTION PROGRAM$1,386,495
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$1,346,523
TRANSITIONS OF PA$1,342,576
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER INC$1,164,485
SAFE BERKS$1,155,829
ALLE-KISKI AREA HOPE CENTER$1,134,818
ARISE$1,051,989
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$1,047,717
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER CHESTER COUNTY$1,019,455
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER LANCASTER CO$955,367
SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTER$925,261
YWCA NORTHCENTRAL PA WISE OPTIONS$879,631

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $122.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$228M · 62 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -103% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$228M

$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

-103%

Still filing today

97%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WC
WOMEN'S CENTER PITTSBURGH
7× · 2018–2025 · $13M · revenue +61% · 29% of their budget
WA
WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC
7× · 2018–2025 · $12M · revenue +11%
TP
TURNING POINT LEHIGH VALLEY
7× · 2018–2025 · $8.7M · revenue +103% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

SH
SAFE HAVEN INC
one grant, 2018 · $64k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Women's Aid Service Inc

To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.

Crime & Legal

Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault

The agency provides services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault including crisis intervention, safety planning, medical and legal advocacy, adult and youth support groups, and community prevention education. the agency…

Health

Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services

Womens Information Services Inc

To provide advocacy, safety options and support services to survivors of domestic violence and adult sexual assault.

Human Services

Women's Alliance Inc

Provide shelter, support and advocacy for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and for homeless families

Human Services

Crisis Center & Women's Shelter Inc

To promote a culture of non-violence and social justive through the empowerment of all those impacted by domestic violence.

Human Services

Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services

A Woman's Place Incorporated

To shelter and help empower victims/survivors of domestic abuse.

Human Services

Domestic Violence

The Organization provides direct services to victims and their families who are impacted by violent crime. These services include access to a 24 hour crisis line, shelter for those in imminent danger, support groups, advocacy assistance…

Human Services

Domestic Abuse Council of

Assist victims of domestic violence

Human Services

S a F E Shelter

Provides Crisis intervention and advocacy for Victims of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault. Provides Emergency confidential Shelter to victims of Domestic Violence.

—

Womens Resource Center

Victims of domestic violence and sexual assault need access to services that assist them in recovering from their trauma and moving forward in their lives. wrc is dedicated to providing the highest quality supportive counselling, shelter…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center and the most unlike its peers is Havin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/63

the rest of the field

6,104/78,099

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

60/62

Grantees still filing

55/62

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$161,141,282Other$51,965,793Health$11,394,413Crime & Legal$1,902,011Environment$1,893,492

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Respect TogetherPA76× affinity33 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Respect Together · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Betty and Leo Balzereit Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · YWCA USA Inc · More Than a Phone Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION OF LEBANON COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 251634670 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION OF LEBANON COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 78% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pennsylvania Coalition Against?

Find your warmest path to Pennsylvania Coalition Against through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pennsylvania Coalition Against?

More from the funding graph

PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pennsylvania Coalition Against?

More from the funding graph