Skip to content

· Private foundation

Penland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$892k
Granted FY2025still arriving
83
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$2.3MYouth Development$335kHuman Services$277kCommunity Improvement$219kEducation$211kPublic Benefit$182kReligion$156kRecreation & Sports$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k62 grants · $159k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $296k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $437k
$3,100
Median grant
6
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIFT OF LIFE$112,000
C 3 FOUNDATION$110,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$95,000
GIRLS HAVEN INC$65,000
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$55,300
THE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$42,800
YMBL$31,600
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MOMS FOR AMERICA$25,000
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE$25,000
HARDIN COUNTY YOUTH PROJECT SHOW$22,450
CHAMBERS COUNTY YOUTH LIVESTOCK SHO$18,073
LAMAR UNIVERSITY$15,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$15,000
CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETX$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $209k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOMS FOR AMERICA: $25k → 14%SILSBEE VISITOR CENTER: $626 → 13%LOULA FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN INC: $65k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN INC: $21k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN INC: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN INC: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN INC: $20k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $3k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $1k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $1k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $1k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $1k → 19%GO 4 THE BELL: $5k → 19%GO 4 THE BELL: $5k → 19%BOYS HAVEN: $1k → 19%BOY'S HAVEN OF AMERICA: $1k → 19%BOYS HAVEN: $1k → 19%BOYS HAVEN: $1k → 19%BOY'S HAVEN OF AMERICA: $1k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $5k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEX: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Penland Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 79%.

Penland Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 74 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 56 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
71

Total granted

$3.8M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+4%

Still filing today

32%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JR
    Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program
    5× · 2020–2025 · $589k · revenue +49%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    6× · 2020–2025 · $388k · revenue +69%
  • T1
    THE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $196k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FF
    FEDERAL FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS USA GAMES
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
2
Texans for Lawsuit Reform Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Crime Stoppers of South Texas Inc
—
4
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
5
Texas Amateur Athletic Federation

To create and maintain a permanent organization representative of amateur athletic and to establish the highest ideals of amateur sports in the state of texas

—
6
Gatesville Fire Department Inc

To serve the city of Gatesville and the surrounding communities with a voluntary Fire Department for the protection of lives, homes, and property of the citizens.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Little Texas Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire protection for little texas commuity of macon county, alabama.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Hospice of East Texas Foundation

Hospice of east texas foundation operates for the benefit of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
9
Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc
—
10
The State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas

The Association serves the fire and emergency responders of Texas and beyond, exists to improve the Texas fire service, and is committed to the betterment of Texas emergency services.

—
11
Post Oak Baseball Foundation

The corporation shall be organized, and at all times operated, exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of post oak little league, inc., houston, texas, a nonprofit corporation organization.

—
12
Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System Foundation

Supporting the Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Phc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
33/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETX: $708,500 · OtherCHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETXMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $527,335 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERTHE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $196,495 · OtherTHE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXASKOUNTZE HIGH SCHOOL: $143,224 · OtherKOUNTZE HIGH SCHOOLYMBL: $103,000 · OtherHARDIN COUNTY YOUTH PROJECT SHOW: $96,799 · Other+142 more: $874,445 · Other+142 moreJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $589,490 · HealthJulie Rogers Gift of Life …Texas Children's Hospital: $387,900 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital+3 more: $25,500 · HealthC3 FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $146,000 · Human ServicesMoms for America Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesGo 4 The Bell Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $10,000 · Human ServicesGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $7,000 · Human Services+3 more: $11,626 · Human ServicesFEDERAL FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationLAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationPUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $50,000 · Public BenefitASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $35,000 · Public BenefitIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $71,000 · Religion
Other$2,649,798Health$1,002,890Youth Development$210,000Human Services$209,626Education$110,500Public Benefit$85,000Religion$71,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $589,490 over 5y, 12% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $387,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetC3 FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $196,495 over 6y, 24% of budgetGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $146,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFEDERAL FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $71,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC KNOWLEDGE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST TEXAS CIRCLE OF HOPE INC: $23,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetBEAUMONT PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS: $20,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & BEYOND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGo 4 The Bell Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS ENERGY MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSilsbee Little League: $9,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetLAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKOUNTZE LITTLE LEAGUE: $7,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Haven of America Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBabe Didrickson Zaharias Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetKOUNTZE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,600 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetAngelina College Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOW Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUMBERTON LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RICE FESTIVAL INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSwifty Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEDERLAND HERITAGE FESTIVAL FOUNDAT: $600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPHC FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGLADIATOR BASEBALL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWEST END LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds C3 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERAL FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Moms for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST TEXAS CIRCLE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT NECHES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationTX29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · The Morgan Charitable Foundation · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust · Sidney and Charline Dauphin Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Penland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Penland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Penland Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Penland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 168 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Penland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph