Skip to content
Penelope and Ed Peskowitz Eolp Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Penelope and Ed Peskowitz Eolp Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$13MYouth Development$4.7MEducation$2.2MCivil Rights$699kRecreation & Sports$350kPublic Benefit$215kInternational$152kHousing & Shelter$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$200,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDNEY TRANSPLANT COLLABORATION$1,425,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$200,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
DR RICHARD BARNETT FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%FRIENDSHIP GAMES: $250k → 10%DR RICHARD BARNETT FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%DAILY BREAD INC: $27k → 10%VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $50k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%KIDNEYS IN COMMON: $500k → 18%INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $50k → 11%THE LYMPHATIC MALFORMATION INSTITUTE: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $1.0M → 11%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%DR RICHARD BARNETT FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY & ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $60k → 14%VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $50k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $533k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $7k → 11%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%ISRAEL POLICY FORUM: $30k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY & ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $250k → 18%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%PRO PUBLICA INC: $20k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $35k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $25k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $20k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%PROPUBLICA INC: $10k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $25k → 17%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON: $5k → 14%CARMI SHELLA EDEN: $3k → 14%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $1.5M → 14%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $1.5M → 14%HANNS-SEIDEL FOUNDATION USA INC (ACPD): $37k → 14%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $1.0M → 14%HANNS-SEIDEL FOUNDATION USA INC (ACPD): $35k → 14%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $625k → 14%KIDNEY TRANSPLANT COLLABORATIVE: $5.0M → 14%HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200k → 14%KIDNEY TRANSPLANT COLLABORATION: $2.1M → 14%HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE SEED FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%READING INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%KIDNEY TRANSPLANT COLLABORATION: $1.4M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
MO
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 15 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$20M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.6M · revenue +23% · 39% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ALLIANCE FOR PAIRED DONATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3.5M · revenue +148% · 86% of their budget
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $499k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • KI
    KIDNEYS IN COMMON
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -97% · 73% of their budget
  • TA
    TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $269k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Abim Foundation

See schedule o.as an operating charity, the abim foundation develops and implements projects in support of our mission to advance the core values of medical professionalism as a force to improve the quality of health care.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Center for Democracy and Technology

Advocating for public policies that advance democratic values in the digital age.

Civil Rights
5
Dana-Farber Inc

The purpose and activities of dana-farber, inc. are to promote and support the exempt missions of dana-farber cancer institute and to provide investment management services.

Unclassified
6
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hanns Seidel Foundation Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kidney Transplant Collaborative: $8,525,000 · HealthKidney Transplant CollaborativeTHE ALLIANCE FOR PAIRED DONATION INC: $3,500,000 · HealthTHE ALLIANCE FOR PAIRED DONATION INCKIDNEYS IN COMMON: $500,000 · Health+4 more: $230,000 · HealthPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $4,625,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATION…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $1,017,444 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF…MY WAY FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherMY WAY FOUNDA…TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $269,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIV…MAYO CLINIC: $250,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual gr…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATI…+10 more: $219,521 · Other+10 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $782,914 · EducationEmory University: $50,000 · EducationIVote Civic Education Fund Inc: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $499,250 · Civil RightsDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $180,000 · Public BenefitVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $100,000 · Public BenefitISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $80,000 · InternationalHANNS SEIDEL FOUNDATION USA INC: $72,105 · International
Health$12,755,000Youth Development$4,625,000Other$2,555,965Education$877,914Civil Rights$519,250Public Benefit$280,000International$152,105

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKidney Transplant Collaborative: $8,525,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $4,625,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR PAIRED DONATION INC: $3,500,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $782,914 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKIDNEYS IN COMMON: $500,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $499,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $180,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai: $100,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHANNS SEIDEL FOUNDATION USA INC: $72,105 over 2y, 17% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEmory University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIVote Civic Education Fund Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAILY BREAD INC: $26,821 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDR RICHARD BARNETT FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE LYMPHATIC MALFORMATION INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE SEED FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Fede…T Rowe Price Program …Tides FoundationThe Chicago Community…Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY16.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Penelope and Ed Peskowitz Eolp Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Penelope and Ed Peskowitz Eolp Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Penelope and Ed Peskowitz Eolp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home