Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$155kArts & Culture$108kPhilanthropy$72kHealth$51kCivil Rights$21kFood & Nutrition$20kEducation$19kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FARMER TO FARMER$31,000
WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA (WOLA)$20,000
Individual grant recipient$13,300
KAKENYA'S DREAM$12,500
GLOBAL SANTA FE$11,000
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION$4,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,500
FIRE AID LA$2,500
INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART MARKET$2,500
SHELTERBOX USA$2,000
PROJECT STREET VET$2,000
K-9S FOR WARRIORS$1,500
MERCY CORPS$1,500
TOBYS HOPE FOR CANINE CANCER$1,250
THE FOOD DEPOT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%THE FOOD DEPOT: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
CA
CO
VA
DE
AZ
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 61% of Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 3% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 22 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
23

Total granted

$462k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+0%

Still filing today

55%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +512%
  • FT
    Farmer to Farmer Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $19k · revenue +94%
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IA
    IDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +0%
  • NH
    NORTHWEST HOPE AND HEALING
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
National Gallery of Art

The National Gallery of Art serves the nation by welcoming all people to explore and experience art, creativity, and our shared humanity.

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture
6
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
7
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
8
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
10
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
11
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
12
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of Santa Fe Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GO PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $156,903 · OtherGO PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONWOLA: $63,348 · OtherWOLATHE LILY PROJECT: $38,500 · OtherTHE LILY PROJECTFARMER TO FARMER: $31,000 · OtherFARMER TO FARMERMULTICOLORES: $25,500 · OtherMULTICOLORESWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA (WOLA): $25,000 · OtherWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA (WOLA)Farmer to Farmer Inc: $18,900 · OtherDREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC: $18,765 · Other+30 more: $71,370 · Other+30 moreKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $60,428 · EducationKAKENYA CENTER …IDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,200 · EducationIDYLLWILD ARTS …+1 more: $100 · EducationGLOBAL SANTA FE: $11,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $2,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 · InternationalK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $8,500 · AnimalsPROJECT STREET VET: $5,200 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $1,000 · Human ServicesPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $6,053 · PhilanthropySEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $1,389 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $741 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $624 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $450 · Arts & Culture
Other$449,286Education$80,728International$15,500Animals$13,700Human Services$11,000Philanthropy$6,053Arts & Culture$3,704

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $60,428 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetIDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION: $20,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFarmer to Farmer Inc: $18,900 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetDREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC: $18,765 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $6,053 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT STREET VET: $5,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER: $1,750 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $1,389 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LILY PROJECT INC: $1,150 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $741 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $624 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOZEFO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds IDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Farmer to Farmer Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT STREET VET ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE LILY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARD MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Peggy and Brian Sassi Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peggy and Brian Sassi’s filings →

More from the funding graph