Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pegasus Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$1.4MEducation$96kRecreation & Sports$59kEnvironment$43kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$12kReligion$11kHealth$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.4M
$900
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB'S DONOR ADVISED FUND$1,391,137
THOMASVILLE ART AND ANTIQUES SHOW$900
SEAL FUTURE FUND$400
PROJECT PUFFIN$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIEVE AFFECTIVE EDUCATION: $3k → 9%KIEVE AFFECTIVE EDUCATION: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
UT
VA
AZ
TN
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$292k · 44 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
5

Total granted

$292k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+7%

Still filing today

57%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsScience & TechAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $39k · revenue +68%
  • HU
    HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +37%
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • PH
    PEBBLE HILL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • LF
    LIFE FLIGHT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • TA
    THOMAS ARTS AND ANTIQUES SHOW
    one grant, 2020 · $765

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
10
Amherst College Trustees

Amherst college educates students of exceptional potential from all backgrounds so that they may seek value and advance knowledge, engage the world around them, and lead principled lives of consequence. amherst brings together the most…

Education
11
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taft School Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Pebble Hill Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsLand Conservation Organizat…Public University Foundatio…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr11%36%35–55yr13%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr11%51%35–55yr13%43%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB'S DONOR ADVISED FUND — $1,391,137 · OtherSCHWAB'S DONOR ADVISED FUND+32 more — $97,580 · Other+32 moreCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $32,000 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $30,000 · EducationROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL — $4,100 · EducationNORTH AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAWTON HOUSE LIBRARY INC — $4,000 · EducationDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,600 · Education+6 more — $6,500 · EducationWAWENOCK GOLF CLUB — $59,200 · Recreation & SportsTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC — $38,700 · Science & TechMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 · HealthARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · HealthDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $6,000 · AnimalsKieve Wavus Education Inc — $5,600 · Human Services
Other$1,488,717Education$84,200Recreation & Sports$59,200Science & Tech$38,700Health$9,500Animals$6,000Human Services$5,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWAWENOCK GOLF CLUB — $59,200 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC — $38,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $6,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKieve Wavus Education Inc — $5,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL — $4,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAWTON HOUSE LIBRARY INC — $4,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Society — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWilliams College — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC — $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEBBLE HILL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARPENTERS BOAT SHOP — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAWENOCK GOLF CLUB
  • Who funds TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  • Who funds Kieve Wavus Education Inc
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds ARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAWTON HOUSE LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Cradle Society
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds THOMAS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Williams College
  • Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust
  • Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH13.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Parker Poe Charitable Trust · William Howard Flowers Jr Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pegasus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Sea Education Association Inc12% of income from government
  • Tall Timbers Research Inc10% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pegasus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pegasus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph