Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

To advance pediatric orthopaedics by promoting education, research, and quality care.

$396k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172023.

Health$1.9MEducation$417kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$543k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $294,992 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $395,934 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,942 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$60,000
MOTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$30,000
CHILDREN'S MERCY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$30,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$30,000
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$30,000
NEMOURS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$14,992
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$10,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S NEW ENGLAND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $30k → 11%AI DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 10%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $49k → 16%SHRINERS CHILDREN'S NEW ENGLAND: $10k → 17%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%GILLETTE CHILDREN'S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE: $59k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $30k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $60k → 22%SETTING SCOLIOSIS STRAIGHT FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%UC REGENTS: $30k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $30k → 14%MOTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 9%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10k → 17%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $169k → 14%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $30k → 14%NEMOURS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $50k → 15%CHILDREN'S MERCY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $30k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $80k → 21%GROWING SPINE FEDERATION: $12k → 17%SHRINERS HOSP FOR CHILDREN PORTLAND: $40k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $30k → 14%HEY CLINIC PA: $31k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON: $30k → 13%RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S: $50k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 16%CWRU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $30k → 17%OREF: $38k → 14%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSITUTE: $30k → 8%THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $29k → 10%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $43k → 16%GILLETTE CHILDREN'S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE: $30k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $30k → 11%SHRINERS: $50k → 14%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $50k → 17%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $110k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 21%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%OREF: $38k → 14%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN NEW YORK: $50k → 17%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $109k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 21%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30k → 14%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $30k → 17%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $86k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDERN: $69k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $50k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$50k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research Grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$622k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$2.0M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+27%

Still filing today

80%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    6× · 2017–2022 · $602k · revenue +63%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2017–2022 · $291k · revenue +69%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $180k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SS
    SETTING SCOLIOSIS STRAIGHT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    one grant, 2018 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

11
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 70 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%61%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,523

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
29/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $601,783 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDRENChildren's Hospital Corporation — $291,180 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $149,722 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIASHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $108,254 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare — $88,605 · HealthOrthopaedic Research and Education Foundation — $75,000 · HealthTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $74,288 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $70,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $69,604 · Health+12 more — $359,163 · Health+12 moreNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC — $109,942 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS …REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $79,787 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVER…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO — $60,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVER…HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY — $50,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL …SETTING SCOLIOSIS STRAIGHT FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherSETTING SCOLIOSIS STR…State University of Iowa — $49,701 · OtherState University of I…HEY CLINIC PA — $31,192 · OtherHEY CLINIC PAUC REGENTS — $30,000 · OtherUC REGENTSUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAN…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $20,000 · Other+3 more — $31,963 · Other+3 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $180,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVE…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $90,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $51,529 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRU…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RES…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PI…Baylor College of Medicine — $20,000 · EducationYale University — $15,000 · EducationNorthwestern University — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$1,887,599Other$542,585Education$416,529Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $601,783 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $291,180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $180,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $149,722 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $108,254 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare — $88,605 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrthopaedic Research and Education Foundation — $75,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $74,288 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $69,604 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $51,529 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $29,712 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING SPINE FOUNDATION — $11,925 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $9,964 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPMC — $9,487 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $381k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph