Skip to content

· Private foundation

Peach Mott Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$718k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHealth$1.2MArts & Culture$762kCommunity Improvement$594kFood & Nutrition$449kReligion$365kHuman Services$323kInternational$245kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $377k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $285k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER$75,000
VAN CLIBURN FOUNDATION INC$60,000
ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS$50,000
SMU DEDMAN SCHOOL OF LAW$50,000
GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$50,000
BRAVO VAIL MUSIC FESTIVAL$35,000
STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL$32,200
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$25,000
HOCKADAY SCHOOL$25,000
YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION$25,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$25,000
ST CELESTINE CATHOLIC MISSION$25,000
NOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS$25,000
LIVE LIKE LOU FOUNDATION$25,000
CENIKOR FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 14%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
WI
NY
OH
CA
CO
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 46 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
14

Total granted

$5.7M
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+26%

Still filing today

63%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +88%
  • Southern Methodist University
    8× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +57%
  • SM
    ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $375k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LD
    LOVE DOES
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • SM
    ST MARK'S FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TC
    TURTLE CREEK RECOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
5
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
7
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
8
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
12
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Momentous Institute; the most unlike its peers is The Kathryn O'connor Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
27/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URSULINE ACAD OF DALLAS FOUNDATION: $245,000 · OtherURSULINE ACAD OF DALLAS FOUNDATIONNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $200,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKST CELESTINE CATHOLIC MISSION: $150,000 · OtherST CELESTINE CATHOLIC MISSIONNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $125,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMST CELESTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $115,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME OF DALLAS SCHOOLS INC: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $85,000 · OtherCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Other+31 more: $1,073,094 · Other+31 moreSouthern Methodist University: $380,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $375,000 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXASHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOLSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $225,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATI…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $150,000 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETYCATCH UP & READ INC: $110,000 · EducationCATCH UP & READ INC+4 more: $120,000 · Education+4 moreVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $360,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn F…NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $185,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXAS P…STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL: $107,200 · Arts & CultureSTRINGS MUSIC…BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $60,000 · Arts & CultureBRAVO COLORAD…JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $550,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK…MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $74,000 · Human ServicesMID-COAST FA…PERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesPERPETUAL HE…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $225,000 · HealthYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $24,999 · Health+1 more: $7,500 · HealthCongaree Foundation: $170,000 · Youth DevelopmentMomentous Institute: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentMPOWER NOW INC: $225,000 · International
Other$2,168,094Education$1,610,000Arts & Culture$712,200Human Services$670,000Health$457,499Youth Development$270,000International$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $550,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $380,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $375,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $360,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $250,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMPOWER NOW INC: $225,000 over 8y, 60% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $225,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $185,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCongaree Foundation: $170,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATCH UP & READ INC: $110,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL: $107,200 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMomentous Institute: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $74,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE KATHRYN O'CONNOR FOUNDATION: $65,594 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCHRIST'S KITCHEN: $63,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $61,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $46,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $24,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCREATION STUDIO DALLAS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetVICTORIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANDER-WESER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $7,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MPOWER NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds Congaree Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds CATCH UP & READ INC ↗
  • Who funds STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE KATHRYN O'CONNOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
  • Who funds BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PERPETUAL HELP HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Overlake Foundation IncTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Overlake Foundation Inc · South Texas Charitable Foundation · The O'Connor & Hewitt Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Galvan Family Charitable Foundation · The Kathryn O'Connor Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peach Mott Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peach Mott Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peach Mott Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Peach Mott Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peach Mott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph