· Private foundation
Peach Mott Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $377k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER | $75,000 |
| VAN CLIBURN FOUNDATION INC | $60,000 |
| GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS | $50,000 |
| SMU DEDMAN SCHOOL OF LAW | $50,000 |
| BRAVO VAIL MUSIC FESTIVAL | $35,000 |
| STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL | $32,200 |
| ST CELESTINE CATHOLIC MISSION | $25,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| LIVE LIKE LOU FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| HOCKADAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| CENIKOR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JPJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION8× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +88%
Southern Methodist University8× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +57%- SMST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS8× · 2018–2025 · $375k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- SMST MARK'S FUNDone grant, 2017 · $50k
- LDLOVE DOESone grant, 2017 · $50k
- HFHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.
Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.
See Disclosure Above.
Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Momentous Institute and the most unlike its peers is The Kathryn O'connor Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MPOWER NOW INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds Congaree Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds CATCH UP & READ INC ↗
- Who funds STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
- Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE KATHRYN O'CONNOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRIST'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
- Who funds BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PERPETUAL HELP HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Overlake Foundation Inc · South Texas Charitable Foundation · The O'Connor & Hewitt Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Galvan Family Charitable Foundation · The Kathryn O'Connor Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peach Mott Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peach Mott Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Peach Mott Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.