Skip to content
Peach Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Peach Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$806k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.1MArts & Culture$806kFood & Nutrition$737kEducation$312kRecreation & Sports$275kPhilanthropy$176kHuman Services$123kYouth Development$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $559k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $223k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$71,000
YWCA$52,000
FOOD LIFELINE$50,000
HERITAGE UNIVERSITY$50,000
ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$30,000
SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION$30,000
KEY TO CHANGE$30,000
TOWN HALL ASSOCIATION$25,000
SEADOC SOCIETY - UC DAVIS FOUNDATION$25,000
RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK$25,000
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE (DBA UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK)$25,000
WASHINGTON WILDLIFE AND RECREATION COALITION$25,000
WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION$25,000
SEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $20k → 9%PIKE MARKET FOOD BANK: $25k → 9%PIKE MARKET FOOD BANK: $15k → 9%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $20k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE (DBA UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK): $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $25k → 9%KEIRO NORTHWEST: $720 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 43 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
46

Total granted

$2.7M
$843k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

74%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +6%
  • SEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +24%
  • CS
    CLIMATE SOLUTIONS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • BM
    BURKE MUSEUMUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
2
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
3
Discover Your Northwest

Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.

Recreation & Sports
4
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
5
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
6
Puget Sound Restoration Fund

To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

Environment
7
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
8
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
9
Stewardship Partners

Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…

Environment
10
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
11
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
12
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Repertory Theatre; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/56
Grantees still filing
40/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $106,500 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $105,000 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherTREES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS (UW BOTANIC GARDENS): $90,000 · OtherWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $83,720 · OtherWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Other+60 more: $1,382,380 · Other+60 moreRE SOURCES: $95,000 · EnvironmentRE SOURCESThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust: $75,000 · EnvironmentThe Mountains t…CONSERVATION NW: $70,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION NWWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $55,000 · EnvironmentWASHINGTON CONS…ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EnvironmentARBORETUM FOUND…Sound Action: $35,000 · EnvironmentSound ActionNATUREBRIDGE: $32,000 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGENorth Cascades Institute: $30,000 · EnvironmentNorth Cascades …Friends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands: $25,000 · EnvironmentVASHON-MAURY ISLAND LAND TRUST: $20,000 · EnvironmentBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $20,000 · Environment+1 more: $15,000 · EnvironmentSEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $115,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE YOUT…Orcas Island Chamber Music Festival: $75,000 · Arts & CultureOrcas Island…Town Hall Association: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTown Hall As…KEY TO CHANGE: $60,000 · Arts & CultureKEY TO CHANG…BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $35,500 · Arts & CultureBURKE MUSEUM…SYMPHONY TACOMA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHEDGEBROOK: $14,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,500 · Arts & CultureFOOD LIFELINE: $250,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFE…BACKPACK BRIGADE: $80,000 · Food & NutritionBACKPACK …TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $100,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $2,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $175,000 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $105,000 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARS: $38,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · Education
Other$2,042,600Environment$522,000Arts & Culture$405,000Food & Nutrition$330,000Community Improvement$202,000Philanthropy$175,000Education$145,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $115,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRE SOURCES: $95,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $83,720 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBACKPACK BRIGADE: $80,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOrcas Island Chamber Music Festival: $75,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetTown Hall Association: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW: $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEY TO CHANGE: $60,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCascade Youth Symphony: $50,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPIKE MARKET SENIOR CENTER: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $35,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSound Action: $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $32,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFORTISSIMO: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Cascades Institute: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOEDEL RESERVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN FEED: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetVASHON-MAURY ISLAND LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSCHMITZ PARK RESTORE: $15,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetINVEST IN YOUTH: $13,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNW Childrens Foundation: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAINIER PREP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Moccasin Lake Foundat…ArtsfundMightycause Charitabl…Wyman Youth TrustThe Bullitt FoundationLucky Seven FoundationGrousemont FoundationReal Progress Foundat…Medina Foundation
Seattle FoundationWA59× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Artsfund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Bullitt Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Medina Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Peach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Peach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peach Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home