Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Peace 4 Animals

PEACE 4 ANIMALS animal welfare organization supports the conservation of endangered species worldwide.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Animals$1.1MFood & Nutrition$155kEnvironment$108kHealth$43kPhilanthropy$25kReligion$20k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $5,851 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $18,963 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,112 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,851
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAWAI'I WILDLIFE CENTER$5,851
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%In Defense of Animals: $5k → 8%Let the Animals Live: $15k → 10%SOCIAL COMPASSION IN LEGISLAT: $25k → 10%Friends of DxE: $25k → 10%Lean and Green Kids: $25k → 11%Earth League International: $20k → 14%MAUI OCEAN CENTER: $23k → 9%Sanctuary of Mana Kea Gardens: $20k → 15%Wild Tomorrow Fund: $11k → 17%A Well-Fed World: $105k → 14%Kindred Spirits Therapy Minis: $28k → 8%Pig Advocates League Inc: $10k → 13%Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary: $35k → 12%Diamond Trust: $25k → 9%Wildlife SOS: $25k → 8%Soft Foot Alliance USA Inc: $15k → 8%CHENGETA WILDLIFE USA: $8k → 9%NJ FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL RESCUE: $30k → 16%Jane Goodall Institute: $40k → 6%Intl Anti-Poaching Fdn IAPF: $55k → 7%Lean and Green Kids: $25k → 11%Last Chance for Animals: $10k → 14%MAUI OCEAN CENTER: $15k → 9%HAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER: $65k → 15%VETPAW INC: $60k → 17%Born Free USA: $28k → 14%Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary: $10k → 12%NJ FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL RESCUE: $15k → 16%INTL ANTI-POACHING FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%Shannon Elizabeth Foundation: $15k → 14%HAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER: $40k → 15%Intl Anti-Poaching Foundation: $25k → 7%Orungutan Foundation Intl: $50k → 14%HAWAI'I WILDLIFE CENTER: $6k → 15%Orungutan Foundation Intl: $10k → 14%COAST AND CANYON WILDLIFE: $17k → 14%WILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $30k → 14%EASTWOOD RANCH FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%Eastwood Ranch Foundation: $10k → 14%Little Angels Project: $100k → 14%EASTWOOD RANCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%Little Angels Project: $15k → 14%Animal Hope and Wellness Fdn: $10k → 14%GENTLE GIANTS: $25k → 14%GENTLE GIANTS: $15k → 14%Linda Blair-Worldheart Fdn: $10k → 14%The Rescue Train: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
NC
DC
HI
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $12k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$12k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$932k · 11 repeat orgs$548k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
24

Total granted

$932k
$548k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+2%

Still filing today

91%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionReligionEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    Eastwood Ranch Foundation
    3× · 2019–2021 · $118k · revenue +55%
  • HW
    HAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER
    3× · 2021–2024 · $111k · revenue +24%
  • AI
    AKASHINGA INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • AW
    A Well-Fed World
    one grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +16%
  • VI
    VETPAW INC
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue -15%
  • JG
    JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
3
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
4
Speak Out for Animals

Animal and Wildlife legal framework

Animals
5
World Animal Foundation Inc

Animal conservation

—
6
Born Free Foundation
—
7
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
8
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
9
Animal Freedom Inc

The organization works to create a world where all animals have their freedom respected by society and protected in law.

Animals
10
Wild Welfare Us

To end the suffering of captive wild animals around the world, by uniting the world's leading animal welfare organizations and captive wildlife facilities in providing expert, practical, and sustainable solutions to improve animal welfare.

Animals
11
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
12
Global Wildlife Foundation

Funding innovative veterinary research and supporting organizations dedicated to preserving and protecting wildlife for future generations.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Hope and Wellness Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sanctuary of Mana Kea Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and AdoptionEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%47%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%56%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr13%3%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/34
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,944

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIAL COMPASSION IN LEGISLATION — $205,000 · AnimalsSOCIAL COMPASSION IN LEGISLATIONEastwood Ranch Foundation — $118,000 · AnimalsEastwood Ranch FoundationHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER — $111,151 · AnimalsHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTERAKASHINGA INC — $105,000 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INCFreedom Farm Animal Sanctuary — $45,000 · AnimalsNEW JERSEY'S FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL RESCUE — $45,000 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $40,000 · AnimalsGENTLE GIANTS — $40,000 · Animals+14 more — $201,466 · Animals+14 moreTHE LITTLE ANGELS PROJECT — $115,071 · OtherTHE LITTLE ANGELS PROJECTVETPAW INC — $60,000 · OtherVETPAW INCORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 · OtherORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTER…KINDRED SPIRITS THERAPY MINIS — $27,950 · OtherKINDRED SPIRITS THERAPY MI…Diamond Trust — $25,000 · OtherDiamond TrustFriends of DxE — $25,000 · OtherFriends of DxECOAST AND CANYON WILDLIFE — $17,000 · OtherSoft Foot Alliance USA Inc — $15,000 · OtherA Well-Fed World — $105,000 · Food & NutritionHEALTHY KIDS HAPPY PLANET — $50,000 · EducationMAUI OCEAN CENTER MARINE INSTITUTE — $37,900 · EnvironmentSANCTUARY OF MANA KEA GARDENS — $20,000 · ReligionWILD TOMORROW FUND — $11,388 · International
Animals$910,617Other$345,021Food & Nutrition$105,000Education$50,000Environment$37,900Religion$20,000International$11,388

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIAL COMPASSION IN LEGISLATION — $205,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetEastwood Ranch Foundation — $118,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE LITTLE ANGELS PROJECT — $115,071 over 2y, 19% of budgetHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER — $111,151 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetAKASHINGA INC — $105,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetVETPAW INC — $60,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHEALTHY KIDS HAPPY PLANET — $50,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetNEW JERSEY'S FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL RESCUE — $45,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS — $40,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetMAUI OCEAN CENTER MARINE INSTITUTE — $37,900 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetWILDLIFE WAYSTATION — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBorn Free USA united with API — $28,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWILDLIFE SOS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFriends of DxE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSANCTUARY OF MANA KEA GARDENS — $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetLET THE ANIMALS LIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWILD TOMORROW FUND — $11,388 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RESCUE TRAIN — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPIG ADVOCATES LEAGUE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetLast Chance for Animals — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHENGETA WILDLIFE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS — $5,163 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Coville-Triest Fa…The Winnick Family Fo…Mary Jo and Hank Gree…PC Fund for Animals C…JP's Peace Love & Hap…The Michelson Found A…Network for GoodAmg Charitable Gift F…Bright Funds Foundati…Paypal Charitable Giv…Sempra FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…
The Coville-Triest Family FoundationMI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Coville-Triest Family Foundation · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Sempra Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peace 4 Animals funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peace 4 Animals?

    Find your warmest path to Peace 4 Animals through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines