Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pcwl Charitable Trust

$600
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$50
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Health$500Animals$200Education$100Food & Nutrition$100Public Safety & Disaster$100Recreation & Sports$100Human Services$100
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Montgomery Area Food Bank$50
American Red Cross$50
Easterseals Camp ASCCA$50
Children's Hospital of Alabama$50
Auburn University$50
Montgomery Humane Society$50
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$50
Operation Smile$50
Hospice of Montgomery$50
Montgomery Area Council on Aging$50
Service Dogs Alabama$50
Two by Two Rescue$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%American Red Cross: $50 → 14%American Red Cross: $50 → 14%Montgomery Area Council on Aging: $50 → 18%Montgomery Area Council on Aging: $50 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$1k
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100 · revenue +15%
  • MA
    MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100 · revenue +17%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100 · revenue +74%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
    Arts & Culture
    2
    Montgomery County Humane Society Inc

    Ending animal homelessness through adoptions, education and outreach while saving lives and supporting the bond between pets and their families.

    Animals
    3
    Michigan Humane Society

    To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

    Animals
    4
    Mercy Medical Corporation

    We, mercy medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. in the tradition of the sisters of mercy, we are committed to continuing the…

    —
    5
    Mothers Milk Bank of Alabama

    Oversee and facilitate the collection, pasteurization, and distribution of human milk. Provide training and education for healthcare providers and community members about the health importance of human milk for neonates and infants.

    Human Services
    6
    Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

    The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

    Human Services
    7
    Montgomery Hospice Inc

    To gentle the journey through serious illness and loss with skill and compassion. to bring comfort by providing compassionate, professional care to community residents who are facing serious illness and loss. to provide dignity for the…

    Human Services
    8
    Jackson Hospital and Clinic Inc

    Jackson hospital is a not-for-profit organization committed to improving the health of all members of our community by providing superior, patient-centered and cost-effective care in a safe, compassionate environment.

    Health
    9
    Marion Regional Medical Center Inc

    Marion regional medical center, inc. owns and operates a 49 bed acute care hospital and a 79 bed nursing home located in hamilton, alabama called north mississippi medical center-hamilton (nmmc-hamilton). nmmc-hamilton is part of the north…

    Health
    10
    Mercy Medical Center

    Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

    Health
    11
    Mississippi Animal Rescue League

    Aquisition and care for homeless and abused animals prevention of cruelty to animals through education

    Animals
    12
    Humane Society of South Mississippi

    The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Two By Two Rescue League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    9/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    TWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $100 · AnimalsTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUEMONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETYSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC: $100 · AnimalsSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INCHOSPICE OF MONTGOMERY INC: $100 · OtherHOSPICE OF MONTGOMERY INCAuburn University: $100 · OtherAuburn UniversityEasterseals Camp ASCCA: $100 · OtherEasterseals Camp ASCCAMONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $100 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY AREA CO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 · Human ServicesAmerican National …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…The Children's Hospital of Alabama: $100 · HealthThe Children's Hos…HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $100 · Food & NutritionHEART OF …OPERATION SMILE INC: $100 · InternationalOPERATION…
    Animals$300Other$300Human Services$200Health$200Food & Nutrition$100International$100

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF MONTGOMERY INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE DOGS ALABAMA INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    John and Joyce Caddell FoundationAL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: John and Joyce Caddell Foundation · The J K Lowder Family Foundation · Arthur M Britton Foundation Inc · Carol W & Myron J Rothschild Fund · Samuel L Schloss Family Foundation Tr Schlossburke K Trustee · B Stephen Schloss Foundation · The S Adam Schloss Foundation Inc · The Landa Fund · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Pcwl Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pcwl Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Pcwl Charitable Trust?

      Find your warmest path to Pcwl Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Pcwl’s filings →

      More from the funding graph