Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pauline Altman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$178k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$670kEducation$189kYouth Development$173kRecreation & Sports$80kArts & Culture$35kEnvironment$34kCivil Rights$20kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$70,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$28,200
THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
METHODIST FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$10,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOUSTON ZOO$10,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $7k → 16%METHODIST FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $7k → 16%HOUSTON ZOO: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%GENESYS WORKS: $5k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $20k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $16k → 16%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $8k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $6k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $6k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%THE WESTVIEW SCHOOL: $15k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $28k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $25k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-20%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    The Westview School Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $126k · revenue +43%
  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +41%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • UO
    UNIV OF HOUCT BAUER COLLEGE OF BUSI
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
5
The Awty International School

See Schedule OThe purpose of Awty International School (Awty) is to create an environment where students experience excellence every day to make their mark on the world alongside their community, in a spirit of curiosity, courage and…

—
6
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
9
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $560,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERDRESS FOR SUCCESS: $173,200 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSUniversity of Michigan: $75,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan+6 more: $65,000 · Other+6 moreThe Westview School Inc: $126,000 · EducationThe Westview …SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $23,000 · EducationSPRING BRANCH…Northwestern University: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $35,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $34,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$873,200Education$149,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Arts & Culture$35,000Environment$34,000Health$25,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Westview School Inc: $126,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $75,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $34,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Westview School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Houston Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA7.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pauline Altman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pauline Altman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pauline Altman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph