Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paulette Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$46kArts & Culture$39kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$12kHealth$9kEnvironment$8kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Repertory Theatre$25,000
St Catherine's School$10,000
St Stephen's Church$10,000
Chesapeake Bay Foundation$5,000
VMI Alumni Foundation$5,000
MCV Foundation$5,000
YMCA of Greater Richmond$5,000
New Community School$5,000
Feed More$2,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$2,000
Caritas$2,000
Habitat for Humanity$2,000
George C Marshall Foundation$1,000
Make A Wish Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA of Greater Richmond: $5k → 22%YMCA of Greater Richmond: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 42% of Paulette Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 60%.

Paulette Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 8 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$123k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+22%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEW COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769)
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VK
    Vmi Keydet Club
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -30%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
2
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
3
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
6
Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce

Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.

—
7
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
8
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
9
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
10
Virginia Capital Trail Foundation

The virginia capital trail foundation exists to protect, promote, and enhance the virginia capital trail and engage communities around it.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
12
Va Foundation for Independent Colleges

To secure financial support that enables college-bound students to access and graduate from outstanding virginia independent higher education institutions.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769); the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Catherine's School: $20,000 · OtherSt Catherine's SchoolRiver Road Church: $20,000 · OtherRiver Road ChurchTHE NEW COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE NEW COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATIONSt Stephen's Church: $10,000 · OtherSt Stephen's ChurchVMI Alumni Foundation: $10,000 · OtherVMI Alumni FoundationGEORGE C MARSHALL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherGEORGE C MARSHALL RESEARCH FOUNDATION+4 more: $6,500 · Other+4 moreVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE: $39,400 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATREVmi Keydet Club: $10,000 · EducationVmi Keydet…MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationMEDICAL CO…Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769): $10,000 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$82,500Arts & Culture$39,400Education$15,000Human Services$10,000Environment$7,500Health$3,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA REPERTORY THEATRE: $39,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEW COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769): $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVmi Keydet Club: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE C MARSHALL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paulette Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paulette Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paulette Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Paulette Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paulette Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph