Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paula and Van Jones Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$293kHuman Services$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kHealth$12kEducation$8kPhilanthropy$7kHousing & Shelter$6kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossings Church$110,000
Campus Crusade for Christ$13,500
Hope Force Int'l$10,000
Infant Crisis Service Inc$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
K-Love$5,000
World Missions & Evangelism Inc$3,000
Student Mobilization$2,800
Impact Oklahoma$2,225
Wycliff Bible Translators$2,000
Stand in the Gap$2,000
Reliant Mission$1,800
Edmond Public Schools Foundation$1,500
Life Connection Church$1,200
Arise Ministries$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Stand in the Gap: $2k → 15%Stand in the Gap: $1k → 15%Stand in the Gap: $1k → 16%Stand in the Gap: $1k → 15%Stand in the Gap: $500 → 15%City Rescue Mission: $500 → 16%Fostering Sweet Dreams: $1k → 16%Oklahoma Baptist Homes for Children: $500 → 16%Angels Foster Family Network: $500 → 16%Infant Crisis Service Inc: $10k → 16%Infant Crisis Services Inc: $5k → 16%Infant Crisis Service Inc: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
IA
CO
NE
MO
KY
AR
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$379k · 20 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
25

Total granted

$379k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+36%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Hope Force International
    6× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +158%
  • INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +83%
  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • 1P
    1st Presbyterian Church of Edmond
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • SM
    Search Ministries
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
7
Operation Serve Inc

Provide relief to the poor and distressed by sharing the love of god in word and deed, we accomplish this through mercy missions, leadership training and community outreaches.

Human Services
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

9
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
10
Imi Sos International

Our mission is to provide traditional churches with consultation, pastors and counseling.

Religion
11
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
12
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic School District Foun…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Child and Family ServicesHomeless Services & ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr13%10%5–10yr17%19%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr19%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr19%19%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,393

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Crossings Church — $150,250 · OtherCrossings ChurchCampus Crusade for Christ — $47,400 · OtherCampus Crusade for ChristIndividual grant recipient — $29,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientK-Love — $19,900 · OtherK-Love1st Presbyterian Church of Edmond — $13,000 · Other+25 more — $69,100 · Other+25 moreHope Force International — $35,500 · ReligionHope Force Int…BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $15,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FE…ARISE SINGLE MOMS INC — $4,000 · ReligionARISE SINGLE M…BSF INTERNATIONAL LLC — $2,500 · Religion+1 more — $500 · ReligionINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT OKLAHOMA INC — $7,425 · Human ServicesSTAND IN THE GAP INC — $5,500 · Human Services+4 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $5,000 · EducationEDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 · Education+1 more — $150 · EducationTURNING POINT MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $100 · Housing & ShelterVOICE OF THE TRUTH — $5,000 · Arts & CultureDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE — $4,000 · Health
Other$329,150Religion$57,500Human Services$31,425Education$7,650Housing & Shelter$5,100Arts & Culture$5,000Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHope Force International — $35,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MISSIONS & EVANGELISM INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT OKLAHOMA INC — $7,425 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARISE SINGLE MOMS INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBSF INTERNATIONAL LLC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTERING SWEET DREAMS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hope Force International
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
  • Who funds WORLD MISSIONS & EVANGELISM INC
  • Who funds IMPACT OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds STAND IN THE GAP INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation
  • Who funds VOICE OF THE TRUTH
  • Who funds DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds ARISE SINGLE MOMS INC
  • Who funds BSF INTERNATIONAL LLC
  • Who funds EDMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds FOSTERING SWEET DREAMS INC
  • Who funds ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK OKC INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Kwco Cares Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paula and Van Jones Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph