Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$111kReligion$88kHealth$80kRecreation & Sports$70kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$8kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$573k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTAR$15,000
SEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDS$10,000
HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
BALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
EARLEIGH HEIGHTS VOL FIRE COMPANY$1,000
PARTNERS IN CARE$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
GIVING BACK LINDA'S LEGACY$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSN$500
SPAN INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $500 → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 23 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$344k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+21%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +12%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +58%
  • OF
    ONELEGACY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +862%

Funded once

  • MT
    MEDSTAR TOTAL ELDER CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • HC
    HOUSE CALL PROGRAM AT MEDSTAR
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
2
University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical System Inc

The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…

—
3
University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc

To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.

Health
4
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
5
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Upper Chesapeake Medical Services Inc

To provide physician services to patients of the university of maryland upper chesapeake health system.

Health
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Baltimore Washington Healthcare Services Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.

—
11
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Span Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD CHURCH: $67,500 · OtherST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD CHURCHSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTERCOMMUNITY CENTER (SEVERNA PARK): $40,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CENTER (SEVERNA PARK)MEDSTAR TOTAL HOUSE CALL PROGRAM: $30,000 · OtherMEDSTAR TOTAL HOUSE CALL PROGRAMHOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTAR: $25,000 · OtherHOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTARST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDS: $20,000 · OtherST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDSHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $14,500 · OtherMEDSTAR HEALTH-HOUSE CALL PROGRAM: $11,000 · Other+12 more: $49,000 · Other+12 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…ONELEGACY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthONELEGACY FOUN…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DI…American Heart Association Inc: $4,500 · HealthAmerican Heart…Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthSPAN Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC: $6,500 · Food & NutritionKITTEN RESCUE: $250 · Animals
Other$307,000Health$48,500Human Services$8,000Philanthropy$7,500Food & Nutrition$6,500Animals$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetONELEGACY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPAN Inc: $7,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGiving Back - Lindas Legacy LTD: $5,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEarleigh Heights Volunteer Fire Co: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE RAFT GROUP INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONELEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SPAN Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Giving Back - Lindas Legacy LTD ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Earleigh Heights Volunteer Fire Co ↗
  • Who funds Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE RAFT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KITTEN RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 40%
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc: 40% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph