Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of PAUL V AND MARGARET H RENOFF FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$573k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTAR$15,000
SEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDS$10,000
HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
BALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
PARTNERS IN CARE$1,000
EARLEIGH HEIGHTS VOL FIRE COMPANY$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSN$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
GIVING BACK LINDA'S LEGACY$500
SPAN INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN INC: $1k → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%SPAN INC: $500 → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%SPAN: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$344k · 23 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$344k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+21%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +12%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +58%
  • OF
    ONELEGACY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +862%

Funded once

  • MT
    MEDSTAR TOTAL ELDER CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • HC
    HOUSE CALL PROGRAM AT MEDSTAR
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
2
University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical System Inc

The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…

3
University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc

To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.

Health
4
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
5
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

7
Upper Chesapeake Medical Services Inc

To provide physician services to patients of the university of maryland upper chesapeake health system.

Health
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Baltimore Washington Healthcare Services Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.

11
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Span Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD CHURCH — $67,500 · OtherST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELD CHURCHSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTER — $50,000 · OtherSEVERNA PARK COMMUNITY CENTERCOMMUNITY CENTER (SEVERNA PARK) — $40,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CENTER (SEVERNA PARK)MEDSTAR TOTAL HOUSE CALL PROGRAM — $30,000 · OtherMEDSTAR TOTAL HOUSE CALL PROGRAMHOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTAR — $25,000 · OtherHOUSE CALL PROGRAM - MEDSTARST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDS — $20,000 · OtherST MARTIN'S IN THE FIELDSHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $14,500 · OtherMEDSTAR HEALTH-HOUSE CALL PROGRAM — $11,000 · Other+12 more — $49,000 · Other+12 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…ONELEGACY FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthONELEGACY FOUN…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DI…American Heart Association Inc — $4,500 · HealthAmerican Heart…Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthSPAN Inc — $7,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $6,500 · Food & NutritionKITTEN RESCUE — $250 · Animals
Other$307,000Health$48,500Human Services$8,000Philanthropy$7,500Food & Nutrition$6,500Animals$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC — $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetONELEGACY FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC — $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPAN Inc — $7,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGiving Back - Lindas Legacy LTD — $5,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEarleigh Heights Volunteer Fire Co — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Inc — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE RAFT GROUP INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC
  • Who funds ONELEGACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds SPAN Inc
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Giving Back - Lindas Legacy LTD
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Earleigh Heights Volunteer Fire Co
  • Who funds Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds LIFE RAFT GROUP INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds KITTEN RESCUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paul V and Margaret H Renoff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 40%
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc40% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph