Skip to content
Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable at a glance

· Private foundation

Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.8MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$964kFood & Nutrition$658kRecreation & Sports$448kPhilanthropy$339kPublic Safety & Disaster$239kYouth Development$165kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $234k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $872k
  • $250k+1 grant · $270k
$35,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MTNS INC$270,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$136,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$130,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$100,000
TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$90,000
ALAN GREEN MEMORIAL FND$80,000
OUTDOOR BUDDIES INC$75,000
DAYTON FIRE RESCUE$57,000
DESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO$54,000
LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC$40,000
FOOD BANK OF WYOMING$35,000
COBALT FOUNDATION$30,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $294k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ANEW DAY INC: $15k → 14%THE HUB ON SMITH: $95k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $55k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $50k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $25k → 10%HUB ON SMITH: $21k → 10%SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 35 repeat orgs$705k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
24

Total granted

$8.4M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+38%

Still filing today

66%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $791k · revenue +142%
  • JA
    JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $565k · revenue +17%
  • TS
    TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $550k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CE
    COLORADO ENERGY OFFICE
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • TS
    TRINIDAD STATE JUNIOR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $90k
  • TF
    THEJEFFERSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $90k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Colorado Health Institute
Health
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
6
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
7
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
8
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
10
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
11
JEWISHColorado

We convene, connect, invest, and protect jewish life in colorado, israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy
12
Colorado Healing Fund

Establish a secure way for the public to contribute to victims of mass tragedy and to assist local communities with the financial, emotional, and physical needs of victims of mass tragedies in Colorado

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center; the most unlike its peers is Alan Green Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MTNS INC: $1,895,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MTNS INCJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $565,000 · OtherJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTERWYOMING FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $443,000 · OtherWYOMING FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MNTS: $335,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MNTSALAN GREEN MEMORIAL FND: $182,000 · Other+35 more: $1,757,550 · Other+35 moreLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $791,000 · HealthLUTHERAN MEDICAL …Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $246,000 · HealthPresbyterian Heal…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $155,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH H…SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $115,000 · HealthSHERIDAN COUNTY M…+4 more: $78,000 · Health+4 moreTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 · EducationTRINIDAD STATE C…COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $324,000 · EducationCOLORADO STATE U…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CO…DESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO INC: $110,500 · EducationDESTINATION IMAG…JEFFERSON SCHOOL: $45,000 · Education+3 more: $51,000 · EducationOUTDOOR BUDDIES INC: $377,750 · Recreation & SportsDolphin Warriors: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $279,000 · Human ServicesA NEW DAY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesALAN GREEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $246,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $215,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,177,550Health$1,385,000Education$1,330,500Recreation & Sports$437,750Human Services$294,000Philanthropy$251,000Food & Nutrition$215,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $791,000 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $565,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetOUTDOOR BUDDIES INC: $377,750 over 7y, 44% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $324,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $279,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALAN GREEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $246,000 over 4y, 75% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $246,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $215,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $155,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP: $125,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetDESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO INC: $110,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $94,800 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJOEY'S FOUNDATION INC: $71,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetDolphin Warriors: $60,000 over 2y, 92% of budgetSOUTH COAST LGBTQ NETWORK INC: $54,750 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIDAN KIDS LIFE: $44,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetTHE JEFFERSON FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $30,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetA NEW DAY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO DOULA PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJEFFCO OPEN SPACE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetTONGUE RIVER VALLEY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $8,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDENVER ACADEMY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLER SAFETY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTDOOR BUDDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAN GREEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN STATES CANCER RESEARCH NCORP ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOEY'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dolphin Warriors ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COAST LGBTQ NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN KIDS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE JEFFERSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Homer A Scott & Mildr…The Colorado Health F…Dan & Jeanne Scott Fa…Chandler H Kibbee and…First Interstate Banc…The Denver FoundationWyoming Community Fou…Bf & Rose H Perkins F…Joe and Arlene Watt F…Boettcher FoundationXcel Energy Foundation
Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K Kibbee Foundation for Children · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Denver Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Boettcher Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • South Coast Lgbtq Network Inc: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Paul R and Anna Lee White Family Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul R and Anna Lee White Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home