· Private foundation
Paul Marciano Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $2,909,128 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,025,628 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,116,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $219k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $950k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE | $500,000 |
| AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION | $500,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH | $476,448 |
| CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER | $250,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ELNET | $200,000 |
| THE SKATEPARK PROJECT | $150,000 |
| EN HABANIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION | $125,000 |
| SEPHARDIC TEMPLE TIFERETH ISRAEL | $102,255 |
| DAVID FOSTER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION | $72,750 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $50,000 |
| THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION | $50,000 |
| BEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $50,000 |
| HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $547k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $938k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +110%- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +127%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION5× · 2020–2024 · $881k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICALone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
- UUCSFone grant, 2022 · $500k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +112%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
To offer programs and training that resource individuals and organizations in self-awareness, self-regulation, effective communication and to promote structures of belonging, utilizing council and other practices, to encourage social…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassion Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planet Buyback. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
- Who funds THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KISS THE GROUND ↗
- Who funds VISIONARY WOMEN ↗
- Who funds VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Gindi Maimonides Academy ↗
- Who funds THE SKATEPARK PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARMENIA FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION ↗
- Who funds CAREYES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds HARKHAM-GAON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds WEST COAST TORAH CENTER ↗
- Who funds KELLER RESTAURANT RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
- Who funds Trauma Resource Institute Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Maurice Marciano Family Foundation · The Sassoon Family Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Guess Foundation · The Marilyn and Jeffrey Katzenberg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Weingart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Paul Marciano Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.