· Private foundation
Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $737k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $412k
- $250k+1 grant · $460k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $460,000 |
| SEPHARDIC TEMPLE TIFERETH ISRAEL | $100,000 |
| GIMMEL FOUNDATION | $97,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN | $65,000 |
| Stand with US | $50,000 |
| American Associates Ben-Gurion Univ | $50,000 |
| Yeshivat Ohr Chanoch | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $43,500 |
| Mesivta of Greater Los Angeles | $40,000 |
| YESHIVA KETANA OF LOS ANGELES | $36,000 |
| Colel Chabad | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL | $28,000 |
| Chabad House UCLA | $27,000 |
| American Friends of Shehebar Sephar | $26,000 |
| Jewish Student Center DBA Chabad US | $26,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
73 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue ×13 · 36% of their budget- AFAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +104%
- IEISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE5× · 2020–2024 · $176k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $25k
- OSOur Space LA Valley Beth Shalomone grant, 2023 · $20k
- GCGEMILOS CHASODIM CHASDEI MOSHEone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of religious schools in Israel
Religious School
To further jewish education in israel
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Support for study of torah and chasiddus in ramat shilo, israel
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshivat Hesder Sderotinc and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Yeshivat Hameiri Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Gimmel Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds CLARION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND ↗
- Who funds TZEDEK AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC ↗
- Who funds HARKHAM-GAON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Gindi Maimonides Academy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · Max Candiotty Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Paul Marciano Foundation · Los Angeles Jewish Fund · The Alon and Rosana Miller Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hyman Jebb Levy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.