Skip to content
Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$7.5MEducation$5.0MHuman Services$2.7MAnimals$2.6MHousing & Shelter$2.3MArts & Culture$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.0MReligion$800kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k30 grants · $696k
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Saints Health Foundation - Andrews Hospital Endowment$800,000
Presbyterian Night Shelter$500,000
Communities in Schools Greater Tarrant County$250,000
Fort Worth Museum of Science and History$250,000
The Arbor School$150,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$150,000
Ronald McDonald House of Fort Worth$100,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$100,000
ACH Child and Family Services$100,000
RECOVERY RESOURCE COUNCIL$75,000
Child Care Associates$75,000
Girls Incorporated of Tarrant County$75,000
Justin's Place$75,000
UT Southwestern Moncreif Cancer Center$57,000
CultureHub$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Patriot Paws Service Dogs: $10k → 5%Happy Hill Farm Childrens Home Inc: $36k → 10%Gladney Center for Adoption: $30k → 11%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%Texas Pythian Home: $5k → 8%Gladney Center for Adoption: $15k → 11%Happy Hill Farm: $20k → 10%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $75k → 11%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $75k → 11%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $50k → 11%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $50k → 11%Meals on Wheels: $35k → 11%Como Lions Heart: $50k → 11%Cornerstone Assistance Network: $10k → 11%Cornerstone Assistance Network: $10k → 11%Cornerstone Assistance Network: $10k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $50k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $50k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $50k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $50k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $50k → 11%Community Healthcare of Texas: $50k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $50k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $25k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $20k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $20k → 11%NewDay Services for Children & Families: $10k → 11%NewDay Services For Children & Families: $10k → 11%NewDay Services for Children & Families: $10k → 11%Center for Transforming Lives: $100k → 11%Center for Transforming Lives: $50k → 11%HOPE Farm: $40k → 11%HOPE Farm: $40k → 11%HOPE Farm: $35k → 11%HOPE Farm: $30k → 11%United Community Centers: $25k → 11%Tarrant County Association for the Blind: $20k → 11%United Community Centers: $20k → 11%Justin's Place: $75k → 11%PROJECT 4031: $20k → 11%Tarrant County Association for the Blind dba Lighthouse for the Blind: $20k → 11%Justin's Place: $30k → 11%Guardianship Sevices: $25k → 11%Justin's Place: $20k → 11%Justin's Place: $20k → 11%Guardianship Services: $25k → 11%Project 4031: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 80 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
47

Total granted

$22M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+14%

Still filing today

79%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    All Saints Health Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3.9M · revenue +88%
  • TF
    THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +18%
  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • RP
    Rockitship Public School
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +14%
  • IP
    IDEA Public Schoolsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
3
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
4
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
5
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
7
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
8
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
9
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Texas Children's Health Plan

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
11
Pressley Ridge Texas

Texas family care network, a division of pressley ridge texas, is the single source continuum contractor (sscc) for region 5 (deep east) of texas. as the sscc, texas family care network finds forever families for children in state care by…

Human Services
12
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
64/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Union Gospel Mission: $850,000 · OtherUnion Gospel MissionAll Saints Health Foundation - Andrews Hospital Endowment: $800,000 · OtherAll Saints Health Foundation - Andrews Hospital E…Trinity Episcopal School Austin: $525,000 · OtherTrinity Episcopal School of Austin: $500,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank: $450,000 · OtherCAMP SUMMIT INC: $400,000 · Other+83 more: $7,716,000 · Other+83 moreAll Saints Health Foundation: $3,895,564 · HealthAll Saints Health Fo…+8 more: $797,500 · Health+8 moreTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,525,000 · AnimalsTHE FORT WO…+1 more: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE ARBOR SCHOOL: $425,000 · EducationTHE ARBOR …NEW KEY SCHOOL INC: $346,500 · EducationNEW KEY SC…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $335,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIE…UPLIFT EDUCATION: $250,000 · EducationUPLIFT EDU…IDEA Public Schools: $250,000 · EducationIDEA Publi…CRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $150,000 · EducationCRISTO REY…GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $140,000 · EducationGILL CHILD…ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $120,000 · Education+7 more: $290,000 · Education+7 moreTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,170,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBY…TARRANT COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSING INC: $112,000 · Housing & ShelterCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $250,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Healthcare of Texas: $240,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $150,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesJUSTINS PLACE: $145,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $56,000 · Human Services+12 more: $390,000 · Human ServicesFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $1,100,000 · Arts & CultureRPM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCASA MANANA INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$11,241,000Health$4,693,064Animals$2,575,000Education$2,306,500Housing & Shelter$2,282,000Human Services$1,551,000Arts & Culture$1,190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAll Saints Health Foundation: $3,895,564 over 4y, 17% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,525,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,170,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $1,100,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $450,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARBOR SCHOOL: $425,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $400,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNEW KEY SCHOOL INC: $346,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $335,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $320,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRecovery Resource Council: $297,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $287,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC: $280,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $255,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $250,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Healthcare of Texas: $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe YouthVantage Alliance: $235,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetHelping Restore Ability: $205,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $200,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $170,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $165,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $150,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $147,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $145,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetJUSTINS PLACE: $145,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $140,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCAREITY FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $125,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST FORT WORTH CENTER OF HOPE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJPS FOUNDATION: $112,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSING INC: $112,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMISSION TRAVIS MERCY: $110,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $90,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD CARE ASSOCIATES: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $85,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds All Saints Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE ARBOR SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW KEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds Community Healthcare of Texas ↗
  • Who funds The YouthVantage Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Helping Restore Ability ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee …Sid W Richardson Foun…Amon G Carter Foundat…Community Foundation …Helen Irwin Littauer …The Morris FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Garvey Texas Foundati…Bnsf Railway Foundati…The Rees-Jones Founda…Rainwater Charitable …United Way of Tarrant…
Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX111.8× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Morris Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul E Andrews Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home