· Private foundation
Paul & Karen Chaplin Family Foundation Inc F/K/A Chaplin Family Foundation In
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of PAUL & KAREN CHAPLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC F/K/A CHAPLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION IN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM INC | $15,466 |
| MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $3,600 |
| LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL | $2,055 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION | $1,000 |
| JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION | $200 |
| EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC | $120 |
| BLUE MISSIONS GROUP | $108 |
| SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR | $100 |
| PROJECT NEW BORN INC | $100 |
| NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE | $100 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $100 |
| EXPEDITION INSPIRATION FUND | $100 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $25 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $553 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +163%
- LCLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +136%
DUKE UNIVERSITY7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- MAMAKE A WISHone grant, 2019 · $5k
- SFSUNDARI FOUNDATION (LOTUS HOUSE)one grant, 2019 · $500
- KMKEEP MEMORY ALIVEone grant, 2020 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Punch 4 Parkinsons Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MISSIONS GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EXPEDITION INSPIRATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Punch 4 Parkinsons Corporation ↗
- Who funds CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT NEW BORN INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Wayne & Arlene Chaplin Family Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Paul & Karen Chaplin Family Foundation Inc F/K/A Chaplin Family Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kipp Miami Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- The National Federation of the Blind — 2% of income from government
- Easter Seals South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Paul & Karen Chaplin Family Foundation Inc F/K/A Chaplin Family Foundation In?
Find your warmest path to Paul & Karen Chaplin Family Foundation Inc F/K/A Chaplin Family Foundation In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.