Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
103
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$17MArts & Culture$13MHealth$934kEducation$760kInternational$501kHousing & Shelter$111kCivil Rights$100kEnvironment$93kOther$0
02FY2024 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k81 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $996k
  • $250k+2 grants · $950k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION$600,000
PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC$350,000
YALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT$218,550
Individual grant recipient$200,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$160,000
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$112,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$70,000
FILM INDEPENDENT INC$65,000
SCONSET TRUST INC$58,000
Individual grant recipient$56,741
Individual grant recipient$55,832
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $72k → 17%NINA ZUBRILINA: $13k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 254 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

254 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2024, 194 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

254
86

Total granted

$29M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+29%

Still filing today

6%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5.9M · revenue +21%
  • Metropolitan Opera Association Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +3%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $539k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -48%
  • NC
    NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $68k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
New York City Ballet Inc

Perform, promote and sustain classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
7
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
8
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
9
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
12
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philharmonic Symphony Society of Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Romulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 383 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $1,195,350 · OtherMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $890,000 · Other+187 more: $15,385,677 · Other+187 moreTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $5,853,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF …Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $2,324,870 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association IncMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $539,164 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART+3 more: $509,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreINTERNATIONAL HOUSE: $260,500 · InternationalFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $240,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $100,000 · InternationalICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250,000 · EducationCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human Services
Other$17,471,027Arts & Culture$9,226,034International$600,500Education$250,000Human Services$100,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $5,853,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $2,324,870 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $539,164 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $262,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL HOUSE: $260,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $240,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $152,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $147,570 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSCREENWRITERS COLONY INC DBA ALMANACK SCREENWRITERS: $95,000 over 7y, 9.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds FOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCREENWRITERS COLONY INC DBA ALMANACK SCREENWRITERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros?

    Find your warmest path to Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 383 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul & Daisy Soros Foundation Daisy Soros’ filings →

    More from the funding graph