Skip to content
Patterson Troike Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Patterson Troike Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$778k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MArts & Culture$1.2MHealth$398kCommunity Improvement$349kPublic Benefit$314kHuman Services$262kPhilanthropy$253kHousing & Shelter$155kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $154k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $379k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
$5,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$125,000
TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$62,795
TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS HUMANITIES$57,500
CITY OF TEXARKANA ARKANSAS$33,675
HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA$25,500
CADDO AREA COUNCIL BSA$25,000
THE MUSES PROJECT$22,500
FRIENDS OF TEXARKANA PARKS$20,000
AR-TX REDI$20,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER TEXARKANA$18,100
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE TX$16,596
ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$16,500
Individual grant recipient$16,000
HARVEST TEXARKANA$15,000
RANDY SAMS' OUTREACH SHELTER INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STONEWALL INN GIVES BACK INITIATIVE: $3k → 17%SHEARD INC DBA HEALING TREE: $3k → 17%CLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $4k → 19%CLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $3k → 19%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $5k → 23%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $5k → 23%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $5k → 23%MISSION TEXARKANA INC: $20k → 19%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $5k → 23%CLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $2k → 19%FOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $5k → 23%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $18k → 19%CLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $2k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $14k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $12k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $12k → 19%MISSION TEXARKANA INC: $10k → 19%RUNNIN' WJ RANCH: $10k → 19%RUNNIN' WJ RANCH: $8k → 19%MISSION TEXARKANA INC: $5k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $5k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $5k → 19%MISSION TEXARKANA INC: $5k → 19%RUNNIN' WJ RANCH: $3k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
CO
KY
VA
AR
TN
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 90 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

90 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
52

Total granted

$4.5M
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+11%

Still filing today

42%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $885k · revenue +276%
  • MS
    MAIN STREET TEXARKANA BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FOR A NEW DOWNTOWN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $197k · revenue +40%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $167k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • NM
    NATIONAL MINING HALL OF FAME
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR CULTURAL ECOLOGY
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Arkansas Hope-Texarkana Foundation Inc

The primary purpose of the University of Arkansas Hope - Texarkana Foundation is to advance higher education by securing private financial support for all units and activities of the University of Arkansas Hope Texarkana.

Unclassified
2
Texas Restaurant Association - Dallas Chapter

Promote the restaurant industry

—
3
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
4
Texas Government Accountability Foundation Inc

To foster transparency and uphold ethical standards across all levels of government in texas and empower citizens to hold their government accountable.

Public Benefit
5
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Architectural Foundation

The Foundation's purpose is to build inspiration and leadership to enhance and protect Texas' unique culture and environment for the benefit of future generations. The goals of the Foundation are: to expand and enhance architectural…

Education
7
Texas Tech Alumni Association

The organization cultivates loyalty, tradition, service, and lifelong relationships. supporting and assisting in the development and increasing of the facilities of texas tech university through (1) encourage & establish scholarships, (2)…

Education
8
Hospice of Texarkana Foundation

Established for the financial support of hospice of texarkana, inc.

Human Services
9
Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana

Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance

Human Services
10
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

—
11
Texas Society of Architects

Texas Society of Architects is the voice for Texas architecture, supporting the creation of safe, beautiful, sustainable environments.

—
12
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus St Michael Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Daughters of American Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/60
Grantees still filing
38/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $477,126 · OtherTEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRATEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS HUMANITIES: $256,300 · OtherTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS HUMANITIESCITY OF CLARKSVILLE TX: $181,080 · OtherCITY OF CLARKSVILLE TXTEXARKANA COLLEGE: $155,000 · OtherTEXARKANA MUSEUM SYSTEM: $148,900 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Texarkana Inc: $121,440 · Other+120 more: $1,707,518 · Other+120 moreTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $885,000 · EducationTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOU…+6 more: $58,500 · Education+6 moreMAIN STREET TEXARKANA BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FOR A NEW DOWNTOWN: $197,186 · Community ImprovementAR-TX REDI: $95,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $10,500 · Community ImprovementHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA: $166,935 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $40,000 · HealthALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE - TEXARKANA ARE: $33,700 · Health+2 more: $4,500 · HealthDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $65,825 · Human ServicesMISSION TEXARKANA INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $25,000 · Human ServicesRunnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc: $21,000 · Human ServicesCLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $11,000 · Human Services+3 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesHISTORIC WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $49,400 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SHAKESPEARE CENTER: $25,835 · Arts & CultureThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $11,750 · Arts & CultureCLOSE UP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT: $5,500 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LESLIE LOHMAN MUSEUM OF GAY AND LESBIAN ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,500 · PhilanthropyTEXARKANA VOLUNTEER SERVICES BUREAU INC DBA HANDS ON TEXARKANA: $31,981 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF UNION COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,047,364Education$943,500Community Improvement$302,686Health$245,135Human Services$170,825Arts & Culture$112,485Philanthropy$107,481

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $885,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetMAIN STREET TEXARKANA BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FOR A NEW DOWNTOWN: $197,186 over 8y, 22% of budgetHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA: $166,935 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Texarkana Inc: $121,440 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetAR-TX REDI: $95,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc: $81,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetHarvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc: $75,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $65,825 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS St Michael Foundation: $57,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetRandy Sams Outreach Shelter: $53,965 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHISTORIC WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $49,400 over 6y, 26% of budgetTEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN: $45,845 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION TEXARKANA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE - TEXARKANA ARE: $33,700 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTEXARKANA VOLUNTEER SERVICES BUREAU INC DBA HANDS ON TEXARKANA: $31,981 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetAMERICAN SHAKESPEARE CENTER: $25,835 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $25,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTEXARKANA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetRunnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexarkana United Soccer Association: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTEXARKANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,820 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetANGEL FUND FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR THE PATHWAY: $16,300 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetONE WAY COMMUNITY INC: $15,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF UNION COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCLAY EICHLER MEMORIAL FUND: $14,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXARKANA ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $12,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $11,750 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCLARKSVILLE FOOD PANTRY INC: $11,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCLOSE UP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUND FLOOR COLLECTIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFOUR STATES FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetASHDOWN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHIGH POWERED: $8,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetRED RIVER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCOFFEE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $6,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LESLIE LOHMAN MUSEUM OF GAY AND LESBIAN ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Texarkana: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET TEXARKANA BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FOR A NEW DOWNTOWN ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc ↗
  • Who funds AR-TX REDI ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Prevention Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS St Michael Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Randy Sams Outreach Shelter ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MISSION TEXARKANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE - TEXARKANA ARE ↗
  • Who funds TEXARKANA VOLUNTEER SERVICES BUREAU INC DBA HANDS ON TEXARKANA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE SAKE OF ONE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bobbie a Atkinson…Ledwell Family Founda…Wayne H Garrison Char…Cabe Cook FoundationKelley & Morgan Famil…Vasco McCoy Jr Founda…United Way of Greater…The Morriss Family Fo…American Electric Pow…Christus Health Ark-L…The Scott FoundationArkansas Community Fo…
The Bobbie a Atkinson FoundationTX51.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Ledwell Family Foundation · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · Cabe Cook Foundation · Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation · Vasco McCoy Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc · The Morriss Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Christus Health Ark-La-Tex · The Scott Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patterson Troike Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patterson Troike Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Patterson Troike Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Patterson Troike Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 160 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Patterson Troike’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home