· Public charity
Christus Health Ark-La-Tex
Support the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $2,796,856 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,358,548 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $561,692 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $468k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIV OF AR FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES | $1,654,459 |
| East Texas Border Health Clinic | $300,000 |
| Bowie County Clinical Services Inc | $299,483 |
| CHRISTUS ST MICHAEL FOUNDATION | $249,581 |
| GONOODLE INC | $58,333 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY TEXARKANA | $55,500 |
| ATLANTA MEMO HOSP FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| AR-TEX REDI | $50,000 |
| TOUGH KOOKIE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DIOCESE OF TYLER | $25,000 |
| TEXARKANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $14,500 |
| TEXARKANA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ETEAST TEXAS BORDER HEALTH CLINIC GENESIS PRIMECARE9× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +56%
- ARAR-TX REDI5× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +30%
- TCTEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- PPGISDone grant, 2019 · $300k
- TDTEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATION SMILES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $34k · revenue +9%
- HSHENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary purpose of the University of Arkansas Hope - Texarkana Foundation is to advance higher education by securing private financial support for all units and activities of the University of Arkansas Hope Texarkana.
To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.
Promote the restaurant industry
To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.
To alleviate hunger in southwest Arkansas and northeast Texas through food distribution and education.
Hospice of east texas foundation operates for the benefit of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.
Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texarkana Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Ar-Tx Redi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST TEXAS BORDER HEALTH CLINIC GENESIS PRIMECARE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS St Michael Foundation ↗
- Who funds AR-TX REDI ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Tough Kookie Foundation ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS MISSIONS OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds TEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATION SMILES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Randy Sams Outreach Shelter ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA VOLUNTEER SERVICES BUREAU INC DBA HANDS ON TEXARKANA ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Patterson Troike Foundation Inc · The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · Ledwell Family Foundation · Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christus Health Ark-La-Tex funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.